From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: "Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Integration branch base switchover to Tony's omap-for-linus branch
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:25:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D71047E.1060703@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4837f9c890c8a6c38d346cac73d9cec6@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/4/2011 4:01 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cousson@ti.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:29 PM
>>
>> Hi Rajendra,
>>
>> On 3/4/2011 3:08 PM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
>>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> This however is still not rootcaused and is not the same as the
>> issue
>>> seen with i2c as the WE for GPT1 is already programmed for
>> enabling
>>> wakeup.
>>>
>>> The one way to fix this for now is to put GPT1 block in software
>>> controlled idle as was done by your test patch for i2c.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> From fde94c22bb2db233b0b0cc4c2024d6f4e9f95257 Mon Sep 17
>> 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:33:45 +0530
>>> Subject: [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod: Disable hardware-controlled idle
>> for GPT1
>>
>> Maybe we should emphasis the temporary need for this commit to avoid
>> forgetting it?
>>
>>> Some issues seen (which cause lockups in suspend) with GPT1
>>> after the MPU<->L4_WKUP static dependency was cleared can be
>>> Worked-around for now by forcing GPT1 in software
>>> controlled idle.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
>>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
>>> index 2c58827..9317a05 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
>>> @@ -3989,7 +3989,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if
>>> *omap44xx_timer1_slaves[] = {
>>> static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_timer1_hwmod = {
>>> .name = "timer1",
>>> .class =&omap44xx_timer_1ms_hwmod_class,
>>> - .flags = HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE |
>> HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET,
>>> + .flags = HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE | HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET
>> |
>>> HWMOD_SWSUP_SIDLE,
>>
>> I was wondering why the previous flags were still there, but it
>> looks
>> like the revert was not done.
>>
>> I'll push it with the revert for the flags.
>>
>> Where is the Santosh's branch that should be rebased on top of that
>> one?
>>
> I am trying to rebase it on Kevin's pm-core branch. Will cherry pick
> these patches
Cool, I updated Rajendra's patch and rebased it on top of the revert.
Both patches are below.
You can find them in the following place:
git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git for_2.6.39/omap4_hwmod_data_fixes
Could you check them before I can send a pull request to Tony?
Thanks,
Benoit
---
From aa22c44486c12c388eb96e9fe9b1476267856006 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:01:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "OMAP4: hwmod data: Prevent timer1 to be
reset and idle during init"
The following commit: 38698be:
OMAP2+: clockevent: set up GPTIMER clockevent hwmod right before timer init
Fixed properly the issue with early init for the timer1
So reverts commit 3b03b58dab847883e6b9a431558c7d8e43fa94c6 that is now
generated a warning at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
index 7dbcdf7..7b72316 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
@@ -4005,7 +4005,6 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if
*omap44xx_timer1_slaves[] = {
static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_timer1_hwmod = {
.name = "timer1",
.class = &omap44xx_timer_1ms_hwmod_class,
- .flags = HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE | HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET,
.mpu_irqs = omap44xx_timer1_irqs,
.mpu_irqs_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap44xx_timer1_irqs),
.main_clk = "timer1_fck",
--
1.7.0.4
---
From cdaaad0d1ce032129102b6ebc56e372d6f345861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:33:45 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP4: hwmod data: Temporary disable
hardware-controlled idle for timer1
Some issues seen (which cause lockups in suspend) with timer1
after the MPU<->L4_WKUP static dependency was cleared can be
Worked-around for now by forcing timer1 in software
controlled idle.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
[b-cousson: Update the changelog and the subject]
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
index 7b72316..cfe957a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
@@ -4005,6 +4005,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if
*omap44xx_timer1_slaves[] = {
static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_timer1_hwmod = {
.name = "timer1",
.class = &omap44xx_timer_1ms_hwmod_class,
+ .flags = HWMOD_SWSUP_SIDLE,
.mpu_irqs = omap44xx_timer1_irqs,
.mpu_irqs_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap44xx_timer1_irqs),
.main_clk = "timer1_fck",
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-26 0:26 Integration branch base switchover to Tony's omap-for-linus branch Paul Walmsley
2011-03-01 12:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-01 21:33 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-03 12:30 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-03-04 14:08 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-03-04 14:59 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-04 15:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-04 15:25 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-03-04 16:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-08 15:16 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-08 16:28 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-09 5:08 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-07 23:25 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-08 8:04 ` Cousson, Benoit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D71047E.1060703@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).