From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 03/19] OMAP3+: voltage: remove initial voltage Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 08:22:32 +0530 Message-ID: <4D744870.20909@ti.com> References: <1299338962-5602-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1299338962-5602-4-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <4D738E04.5090207@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.209]:33575 "EHLO na3sys009aog113.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754883Ab1CGCwk (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Mar 2011 21:52:40 -0500 Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so1593432yxh.8 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 18:52:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D738E04.5090207@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: linux-omap , Kevin Hilman , Tony , Paul , linux-arm Sergei Shtylyov wrote, on 03/06/2011 07:07 PM: > >> Blindly setting a 1.2V setting > > Hm, seems tautological... As a non native English speaker, I would like to understand how we could improve this. I suppose you mean "Blindly setting 1.2V" is better here. Am i correct? >> in the initial structure may not even >> match the default voltages stored in the voltage table which are >> supported for the domain. For example, OMAP3430 core domain does not >> use 1.2V and ends up generating a warning on the first transition. [..] -- Regards, Nishanth Menon