From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>,
"Semwal, Sumit" <sumit.semwal@ti.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, "Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@ti.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Taneja, Archit" <archit@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with DSS clocks & accessing registers
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:52:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D74F133.5020101@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90dc32aa0eb6d68d2a56424de664653d@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/7/2011 3:05 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
>> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Cousson, Benoit
>>
>> + Rajendra
>>
>> Hi Tomi,
>>
>> On 3/7/2011 9:22 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin, Paul,
>>>
>>> We currently have a small problem with OMAP4 DSS. When we enable
>> the DSS
>>> clocks, it seems that the DSS registers are not always accessible
>> right
>>> after the clock enable.
>>
>> What clocks are you talking about? As you know, the DSS has a bunch
>> of functional clocks available depending of the use case.
>>
>>> I understood that on OMAP4 the clock framework doesn't guarantee
>> that
>>> the registers are accessible after enabling clocks, and pm_runtime
>> will handle this. Is this correct?
>>
>
> This seems to the question about a so called optional clock (DSS_CLK)
> which really not an optional clock :)
> This clock needs to be enabled and disabled along with interface and
> functional clock for the registers access to work.
To be more accurate, this clock is one of the functional clock available
for the DSS (the other being the SYS_CLK).
You can use dss_clk or sys_clk (through dsi pll) to generate the
functional clock of the DSS. The issue, as I said is that the
availability status of the DSS is bound to the DSS module mode, not to
any of this DSS clock.
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-07 8:22 Problem with DSS clocks & accessing registers Tomi Valkeinen
2011-03-07 13:51 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-07 14:05 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-03-07 14:52 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-03-07 15:03 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-03-08 10:22 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-10 15:07 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D74F133.5020101@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox