From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 00/18] I2C: OMAP: Fixes and removal of cpu_... from driver Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:02:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4D778873.4070308@ti.com> References: <20110308105934.23531.83540.stgit@otae.warmcat.com> <4D76A164.2060801@ti.com> <20110308233820.GJ26463@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:59806 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932208Ab1CIOCt (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:02:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110308233820.GJ26463@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Andy Green , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Ben Dooks , Paul Walmsley Hi Tony, On 3/9/2011 12:38 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Cousson, Benoit [110308 13:34]: >> Hi Andy, >> >> Thanks for that really fast update. That looks pretty good at first >> glance. I still have to review in details. > > Yes nice job! > >> And we need to find some volunteers for OMAP1& 2 testing. > > I gave it a quick try on osk5912, seems to work just fine. > Will apply these for testing purposes to linux-omap tree while > waiting for the minor fixes. > > Looks like Benoit should take the arch/arm/*omap*/*hwmod* > patches, the rest should go throug Ben. So for all of them: Paul and I already acked the hwmod data, but the whole series should maybe go through Ben, because the hwmod files will need some defines added in the i2c header file. So we cannot separate the hwmod* patches from the driver files patches. I just have one minor comment to keep the OMAP4 data in sync with the autogen, but if Andy does not have any important update to do on that series, I can potentially fix that later. Regards Benoit