From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: Code for v2.6.39 merge window frozen, patches archived Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:35:44 +0530 Message-ID: <4D7ED788.90307@ti.com> References: <20110314192538.GH7258@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.77]:39890 "EHLO na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750807Ab1CODFw (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:05:52 -0400 Received: by mail-gx0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 21so84499gxk.5 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:05:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110314192538.GH7258@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren , Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Tony Lindgren wrote, on 03/15/2011 12:55 AM: [..] > Looks like there's one smartreflex patch that does not seem > to exist in patchwork though.. So that one is still lurking > around on the patchwork list of patches until the issue has > been fixed in patchwork.kernel.org. Guess it is too late, but am curious: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129933897910785&w=2 Why has it been dropped from .39(aka archived out)? I dont see any review comments to the contrary from any maintainers explaining why we should'nt take it. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon