From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP PM: Voltage layer clean up
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:48:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D800FEB.9010809@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <704e43df1ea426a676115cd34b93649e@mail.gmail.com>
Vishwanath Sripathy wrote, on 03/15/2011 09:36 PM:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Menon, Nishanth [mailto:nm@ti.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 8:38 PM
>> To: Vishwanath BS
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP PM: Voltage layer clean up
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 20:03, Vishwanath BS
>> <vishwanath.bs@ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch series attempts to do some more clean up on OMAP Voltage
>> layer on top
>>> of the clean up done by Paul as part of
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/591421/
>>>
>>> These patches are generated against latest omap-for-linus branch on
>> Tony's tree
>>> (commit id: 05f689400ea5fa3d71af82f910c8b140f87ad1f3) and tested
>> on OMAP ZOOM3
>>> and OMAP4430 SDP with Smartreflex enabled.
>>>
>>> Vishwanath BS (3):
>>> OMAP PM: Seggregate Voltage layer parameters
>>> OMAP PM: Add support for bypassing VP/VC in Voltage layer
>>> OMAP PM: Add Board specific parameters for OMAP Volatge layer
>>
>> I dont really see why I need to keep fixing your $subjects, but here
>> again,
>> all $subjects, OMAP3+: PM: makes more sense
> This is not OMAP3 specific. It applies to OMAP4 as well.
which is why i recommended OMAP3+ and not OMAP3
>>
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 52 +++++++
>>
>> Curious if Panda and other OMAP3 platforms where considered.
> That's TODO as per my Patch3 commit log.
would've been nice to see that info in 0/3
[..]
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-16 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-15 14:33 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP PM: Voltage layer clean up Vishwanath BS
2011-03-15 14:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] OMAP PM: Seggregate Voltage layer parameters Vishwanath BS
2011-03-17 23:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-18 12:00 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-04-02 0:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-05 7:08 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-04-05 18:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-15 14:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] OMAP PM: Add support for bypassing VP/VC in Voltage layer Vishwanath BS
2011-03-15 15:16 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-03-15 16:14 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-03-16 6:58 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-03-15 14:33 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] OMAP PM: Add Board specific parameters for OMAP Volatge layer Vishwanath BS
2011-03-15 15:38 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-03-16 5:53 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-03-17 23:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-03-15 15:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OMAP PM: Voltage layer clean up Menon, Nishanth
2011-03-15 16:06 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-03-16 1:18 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D800FEB.9010809@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vishwanath.bs@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).