From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Coelho, Luciano" <coelho@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kadiyala, Kishore" <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.39] omap: board-4430sdp: revert hsmmc_info reordering
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:18:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D957C46.9020402@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1301640748-17161-1-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com>
On 4/1/2011 8:52 AM, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
> The order in which the MMC cards are defined in the the 4430sdp board
> file seems to have been mistakenly reorderded as part of an unrelated
> patch. In commit 0005ae73cfe44ee42d0be12a12cc82bf982f518e, where only
> the dev_name was supposed to be changed, the mmc order was changed as
> well. This caused the external SD card reader not to be recognized,
> at least on Blaze.
>
> This patch reverts this change so that the external SD card is
> recognized again.
>
> Cc: Kishore Kadiyala<kishore.kadiyala@ti.com>
> Cc: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho<coelho@ti.com>
> ---
>
> I have started investigating the cause for this problem, because it
> seems to me that the value in the mmc element is what should matter,
> but it doesn't seem to be the case. I believe there is a bug
> elsewhere, that causes the order of the array to matter, but I'm not
> very familiar with hsmmc and I don't have much time right now to delve
> into the problem, so I leave this to the omap people. ;) I can always
> help testing if necessary.
I was about to make the same comment. Why does the order matter since we
have a .mmc field with that information? There is probably something
broken behind that.
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-01 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-01 6:52 [PATCH 2.6.39] omap: board-4430sdp: revert hsmmc_info reordering Luciano Coelho
2011-04-01 7:16 ` Kishore Kadiyala
2011-04-01 8:20 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-04-01 10:26 ` Kishore Kadiyala
2011-04-01 10:54 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-04-01 7:18 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-04-01 8:24 ` Luciano Coelho
2011-04-01 11:37 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D957C46.9020402@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=kishore.kadiyala@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox