From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avik Sil Subject: Re: arm: pmu: support pmu/perf on OMAP4 - booting problem on pandaboard Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:35:52 +0530 Message-ID: <4D9AF790.7010504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4D95E244.1050400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D99D251.6000901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D99EB4B.3020303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:39621 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752743Ab1DELF5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:05:57 -0400 Received: from d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.56]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p35AeuXr009351 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 06:40:56 -0400 Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF94438C803B for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:05:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p35B5uBU341832 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:05:56 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p35B5tXT001917 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:05:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Ming Lei Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 05 April 2011 07:33 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > Hi, > > 2011/4/5 Avik Sil: >> #define OMAP4430_CM_L3INSTR_L3_3_CLKCTRL >> OMAP44XX_CM2_REGADDR(OMAP4430_CM2_CORE_INST, 0x0720) >> [...] >> >> Should I use those identifier instead? > > Yes, seems right, but you need to use the ioremap addresses of the identifiers. > Even after using ioremapped addresses in omap_writel() I'm getting the oops. Can you please point me to the location in mainline, where these l3 clocks are enabled? Regards, Avik >> Are there other definitions for the identifiers you have used? > > As I said before, these are not needed for mainline, so I didn't try these. > > > thanks,