From: Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>
To: Jan Weitzel <j.weitzel@phytec.de>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, andy@warmcat.com,
tony@atomide.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, ben-linux@fluff.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: omap4: i2c reset regs postidle
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:13:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB01F5B.5080607@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303386420-12997-1-git-send-email-j.weitzel@phytec.de>
On 04/21/2011 12:47 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> Without OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE I got i2c controller
> timeouts on each accsess after an NACK message.
> Taking this flag fix it.
Ahhh that will explain why if you accidentally configure LM75 system
monitor support, which isn't there on Panda, the I2C controllers die
slowly on boot. Good catch!
-Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 11:47 [PATCH] ARM: omap4: i2c reset regs postidle Jan Weitzel
2011-04-21 12:13 ` Andy Green [this message]
2011-05-16 7:56 ` Jan Weitzel
2011-05-16 8:13 ` Andy Green
2011-05-16 9:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Weitzel
2011-05-16 17:16 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-05-17 9:26 ` [PATCH v3] " Jan Weitzel
2011-05-17 14:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-18 13:07 ` Jan Weitzel
2011-05-18 14:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-14 10:05 ` [RFC] ARM: OMAP2+ i2c NACK without STP Jan Weitzel
2011-06-14 10:24 ` Tony Lindgren
[not found] ` <20110614102409.GN3352-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-14 10:54 ` [PATCH] " Jan Weitzel
2011-12-27 14:48 ` T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
[not found] ` <CANrkHUZ530H+0+YKy2QJPFbwUQ1zqD=OaSrF6ByTbpx6eU421Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-01-04 0:07 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB01F5B.5080607@linaro.org \
--to=andy@warmcat.com \
--cc=andy.green@linaro.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=j.weitzel@phytec.de \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).