From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] REGULATOR: TWL6025: add support to twl-regulator Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 10:57:54 +0100 Message-ID: <4DDA2FA2.2000604@ti.com> References: <1306095684-7732-1-git-send-email-gg@slimlogic.co.uk> <1306095684-7732-2-git-send-email-gg@slimlogic.co.uk> <20110522224857.GA15882@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110522224857.GA15882@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Graeme Gregory , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Balbi, Felipe" , "lrg@slimlogic.co.uk" , "linux@slimlogic.co.uk" , "Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 22/05/11 23:48, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:21:23PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: >> Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the >> group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how >> regulators are enabled and disabled. > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > >> Since V1 >> >> Use the features variable passed via platform data instead of calling >> global function. > > Change histories like this should usually come after the --- so things > like git am strip them out of what actually ends up in git. Applied. Thanks Liam