From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Subject: N900 USB fix (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:57:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF1C075.9080401@maxwell.research.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87boy73qrs.fsf@ti.com>
Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Kevin and Felipe,
>>
>> Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> In commit 7538e3db6e015e890825fbd9f8659952896ddd5b (PM: add support
>>> for device power domains) a better way for handling platform-specific
>>> power hooks was introduced.
>>>
>>> Rather than using the platform_bus dev_pm_ops overrides
>>> (platform_bus_set_pm_ops()), this patch moves the OMAP runtime PM
>>> implementation over to using device power domains.
>>>
>>> Since OMAP is the only user of platform_bus_set_pm_ops(), that
>>> interface can be removed (and will be in a forthcoming patch.)
>>
>> I have little doubt of the correctness of the patch itself, but it
>> actually does break the USB on N900. I don't know PM so well that I
>> would have a good idea what might be going wrong here, so I'm not
>> certain that this is specific to the N900 either.
>>
>> It looks strange to me also but I've tested it several times so I'm
>> fairly certain that the culprit is this very patch. :-)
>
> You're correct, it's broken.
>
> A fix has been posted (and pull req sent to Tony.) Can you try my
> for_3.0/pm-fixes branch which fixes this problem? It's available in my
> git tree:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git
Hi, Kevin!
Many thanks to you! :-) The patches indeed fix the problem. I seem to
have used for_3.0/pm-fixes-2 branch, though. I guess that doesn't really
matter. :-)
Cheers,
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-10 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 0:02 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/6] ARM: sh-mobile: runtime PM: convert to device powerdomains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:49 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-09 14:30 ` Sakari Ailus
2011-06-09 16:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-06-10 6:57 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2011-06-13 8:28 ` N900 USB fix (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/6] OMAP2+: PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains) Jarkko Nikula
2011-06-13 8:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-06-13 8:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] OMAP1: runtime PM: drop platform bus implementation Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 16:56 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08 0:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-08 5:01 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] ARM: use common clock-based runtime PM implementation on SH-mobile & OMAP1 Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 0:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 5:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] ARM: runtime PM: consolidate runtime PM implementations Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 14:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 17:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-07 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-08 0:32 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF1C075.9080401@maxwell.research.nokia.com \
--to=sakari.ailus@maxwell.research.nokia.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).