Re: [PATCH 1/6] OMAP4: Add missing clock divider for OCP_ABE_ICLK

[Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>]

On 7/15/2011 9:34, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 2). The "ocp_abe_iclk" is an interface clock and is not a parent to any
> other functional clock and therefore, is not driving any internal logic
> in a peripheral which would have a direct impact of the speed of that
> peripheral. However, there does appear to be another bug here in the
> clock44xx_data.c as it shows that the "ocp_abe_iclk" is parent to the
> "slimbus1_fck" which I believe is incorrect. According to the TRM, the
> the ocp_abe_iclk is parent to the slimbus1_iclk. I can send another
> patch for this. However, I will let Benoit chime in first.

On further inspection of the clock44xx_data.c, it appears that all 
interface clocks are called xxx_fck and not xxx_ick. I will ask Benoit 
about this. However, this particular clock we are dealing with here is 
an interface clock.

Cheers
Jon