public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
To: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: "paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/5] OMAP DSS HWMOD fixes
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:51:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3FD4E1.9020702@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312805027.1747.4.camel@lappyti>

Hi,

On Monday 08 August 2011 05:33 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 17:13 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Monday 08 August 2011 02:45 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
>>> Second try with the DSS HWMODs
>>>
>>> This set fixes the DSS clocks in HWMOD data, and implements a new reset
>>> mechanism for dss_core.
>>>
>>> The new dss_reset function doesn't actually do a reset, it just enables all DSS
>>> clocks and waits for the reset to complete. This should be better approach than
>>> actually doing a reset, because:
>>>
>>> OMAP4 - dss_core HW doesn't contain a SW reset bit so doing a reset is
>>> impossible. But after power-on we need to enable all DSS clocks and wait for
>>> the power-on reset to complete.
>>>
>>> OMAP2/3 - dss_core does have a SW reset bit, but resetting dss_core also resets
>>> all the other DSS modules. This means that the other modules could be left
>>> uninitialized, as the hwmod code handles all modules independently, and in this
>>> case initializes only dss_core's registers. Thus dss_core's reset shouldn't be
>>> used, and we should only verify that the power-on reset has completed.
>>
>> If the bootloader enables DSS, we need to do a reset so that DSS2 driver
>> can start with DSS HW in a clean state. With this patch set, how do we
>> take care of such a scenario?
>
> We don't. That should be done in a future patch.
>
> I think we should extend this reset function, and disable the LCD
> outputs and reset the clock switches there.
>
> I didn't want to do that yet as I wanted to fix the current problem with
> the reset first and I don't have an environment where to test it. I hope
> you can help here =).

Yes, we can extend over this. But we would still access DISPC registers 
in the dss_core's custom reset function. Wouldn't this break the "HWMOD 
model where every DSS module is independent"?

Archit

>
>   Tomi
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-08 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-08  9:15 [PATCHv2 0/5] OMAP DSS HWMOD fixes Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-08  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 1/5] OMAP2xxx: HWMOD: fix DSS opt clocks Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-08  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 2/5] OMAP3: " Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-08  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 3/5] OMAP4: " Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-09 16:17   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-08  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 4/5] OMAP2/3: HWMOD: Add SYSS_HAS_RESET_STATUS for dss Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-08  9:15 ` [PATCHv2 5/5] OMAP: HWMOD: Unify DSS resets for all OMAPs Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-20  5:30   ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-20  6:26     ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-22  7:00       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-22 19:10         ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-08 11:43 ` [PATCHv2 0/5] OMAP DSS HWMOD fixes Archit Taneja
2011-08-08 12:03   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-08 12:21     ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2011-08-08 12:23       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-18  7:21 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-08-21  6:03   ` Paul Walmsley
2011-08-22  6:35     ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E3FD4E1.9020702@ti.com \
    --to=archit@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox