From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: "Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:52:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E73387B.2030403@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314973520-3585-6-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
Hi Kevin,
On 9/2/2011 4:25 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Most devices are using the same default omap_device_pm_latency structure
> during device built. In order to avoid the duplication of the same
> structure everywhere, add a default structure that will be used if
> the device does not have an explicit one.
[...]
> - od->pm_lats = pm_lats;
> - od->pm_lats_cnt = pm_lats_cnt;
> + if (pm_lats) {
> + od->pm_lats = pm_lats;
> + od->pm_lats_cnt = pm_lats_cnt;
> + } else {
> + od->pm_lats = omap_default_latency;
> + od->pm_lats_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap_default_latency);
> + }
Here is the fix for that part. I did the easy version :-). Splitting the structure in two parts will indeed require more work.
I updated the for_3.2/1_omap_device_cleanup branch.
Regards,
Benoit
---
>From ad163000568dd61dee441473d0a576d84152da9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:54:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency
Most devices are using the same default omap_device_pm_latency structure
during device built. In order to avoid the duplication of the same
structure everywhere, add a default structure that will be used if
the device does not have an explicit one.
Next patches will clean the duplicated structures.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
index 7b2cf62..54bbe7b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
@@ -97,6 +97,14 @@
static int omap_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev);
static int omap_early_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev);
+static struct omap_device_pm_latency omap_default_latency[] = {
+ {
+ .deactivate_func = omap_device_idle_hwmods,
+ .activate_func = omap_device_enable_hwmods,
+ .flags = OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST,
+ }
+};
+
/* Private functions */
/**
@@ -510,8 +518,17 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id,
if (ret)
goto odbs_exit3;
- od->pm_lats = pm_lats;
+ if (!pm_lats) {
+ pm_lats = omap_default_latency;
+ pm_lats_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap_default_latency);
+ }
+
od->pm_lats_cnt = pm_lats_cnt;
+ od->pm_lats = kmemdup(pm_lats,
+ sizeof(struct omap_device_pm_latency) * pm_lats_cnt,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!od->pm_lats)
+ goto odbs_exit3;
for (i = 0; i < oh_cnt; i++) {
hwmods[i]->od = od;
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-16 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-02 14:25 [PATCH v2 0/6] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] OMAP: omap_device: Add omap_hwmod_name_get_dev Benoit Cousson
2011-09-26 18:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] OMAP3: beagle-board: Use the omap_hwmod_name_get_dev API Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] OMAP2+: pm: Use hwmod name instead of dev pointer Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] OMAP2+: pm: Remove static devices variable for mpu, dsp, iva and l3 PM Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency Benoit Cousson
2011-09-16 11:52 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-09-16 16:41 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-02 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] OMAP2+: devices: Remove all omap_device_pm_latency structures Benoit Cousson
2011-09-26 22:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E73387B.2030403@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox