public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
To: "Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Semwal, Sumit" <sumit.semwal@ti.com>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [media]: OMAP_VOUT: Fix check in reqbuf & mmap for buf_size allocation
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:19:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E79C142.80508@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E739404EC941E1C@dbde02.ent.ti.com>

Hi,

On Wednesday 21 September 2011 02:10 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Taneja, Archit
>> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 3:30 PM
>> To: Hiremath, Vaibhav
>> Cc: Valkeinen, Tomi; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Semwal, Sumit; linux-
>> media@vger.kernel.org; Taneja, Archit
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [media]: OMAP_VOUT: Fix check in reqbuf&  mmap for
>> buf_size allocation
>>
>> The commit 383e4f69879d11c86ebdd38b3356f6d0690fb4cc makes reqbuf and mmap
>> prevent
>> requesting a larger size buffer than what is allocated at kernel boot
>> during
>> omap_vout_probe.
>>
>> The requested size is compared with vout->buffer_size, this isn't correct
>> as
>> vout->buffer_size is later set to the size requested in reqbuf. When the
>> video
>> device is opened the next time, this check will prevent us to allocate a
>> buffer
>> which is larger than what we requested the last time.
>>
>> Don't use vout->buffer_size, always check with the parameters
>> video1_bufsize
>> or video2_bufsize.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja<archit@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c |   10 ++++++++--
>>   1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c
>> b/drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c
>> index 95daf98..e14c82b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/video/omap/omap_vout.c
>> @@ -664,10 +664,14 @@ static int omap_vout_buffer_setup(struct
>> videobuf_queue *q, unsigned int *count,
>>   	u32 phy_addr = 0, virt_addr = 0;
>>   	struct omap_vout_device *vout = q->priv_data;
>>   	struct omapvideo_info *ovid =&vout->vid_info;
>> +	int vid_max_buf_size;
>>
>>   	if (!vout)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>
>> +	vid_max_buf_size = vout->vid == OMAP_VIDEO1 ? video1_bufsize :
>> +		video2_bufsize;
>> +
>>   	if (V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT != q->type)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>
>> @@ -690,7 +694,7 @@ static int omap_vout_buffer_setup(struct
>> videobuf_queue *q, unsigned int *count,
>>   		video1_numbuffers : video2_numbuffers;
>>
>>   	/* Check the size of the buffer */
>> -	if (*size>  vout->buffer_size) {
>> +	if (*size>  vid_max_buf_size) {
> Good catch !!!
>
>>   		v4l2_err(&vout->vid_dev->v4l2_dev,
>>   				"buffer allocation mismatch [%u] [%u]\n",
>>   				*size, vout->buffer_size);
>> @@ -865,6 +869,8 @@ static int omap_vout_mmap(struct file *file, struct
>> vm_area_struct *vma)
>>   	unsigned long size = (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start);
>>   	struct omap_vout_device *vout = file->private_data;
>>   	struct videobuf_queue *q =&vout->vbq;
>> +	int vid_max_buf_size = vout->vid == OMAP_VIDEO1 ? video1_bufsize :
>> +		video2_bufsize;
>>
>>   	v4l2_dbg(1, debug,&vout->vid_dev->v4l2_dev,
>>   			" %s pgoff=0x%lx, start=0x%lx, end=0x%lx\n", __func__,
>> @@ -887,7 +893,7 @@ static int omap_vout_mmap(struct file *file, struct
>> vm_area_struct *vma)
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>>   	/* Check the size of the buffer */
>> -	if (size>  vout->buffer_size) {
>> +	if (size>  vid_max_buf_size) {
> Don't you think in case of mmap we should still check for the
> vout->buffer_size, since this is the size user has requested in req_buf.

Ah, you are right, the check for the maximum size should only be in the 
reqbuf path. vout->buffer_size would have been updated correctly at time 
of mmap. I'll change this back to vout->buffer_size.

Thanks,
Archit

>
> Thanks,
> Vaibhav
>
>
>>   		v4l2_err(&vout->vid_dev->v4l2_dev,
>>   				"insufficient memory [%lu] [%u]\n",
>>   				size, vout->buffer_size);
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-21 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-16 10:00 [PATCH 0/5] [media]: OMAP_VOUT: Misc fixes and cleanup patches for 3.2 Archit Taneja
2011-09-16 10:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] [media]: OMAP_VOUT: Fix check in reqbuf & mmap for buf_size allocation Archit Taneja
2011-09-21  8:40   ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-09-21 10:49     ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2011-09-16 10:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] [media]: OMAP_VOUT: CLEANUP: Remove redundant code from omap_vout_isr Archit Taneja
2011-09-21 10:05   ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-09-21 10:45     ` Archit Taneja
2011-09-26  5:34       ` Archit Taneja
2011-09-16 10:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] [media]: OMAP_VOUT: Fix VSYNC IRQ handling in omap_vout_isr Archit Taneja
2011-09-21 13:34   ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-09-22  6:15     ` Archit Taneja
2011-09-26 10:19       ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
     [not found]         ` <CAB2ybb8ab9jSFB1J_CQfObB11QcdtQ=6Kf9zdbg0v5Jckf09sw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <CAB2ybb-rZgDvS9Bo6AJF=KVd0irXHa0S0LrPJ=SWr0daJ6gX1w@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-27  5:41             ` Semwal, Sumit
2011-09-27  6:39               ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-09-27  6:49                 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-27  6:54                   ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-09-27  7:01                     ` Archit Taneja
2011-09-27  7:09                       ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-09-27  7:05                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-09-27  6:51                 ` Semwal, Sumit
2011-09-16 10:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] [media] OMAP_VOUT: Add support for DSI panels Archit Taneja
2011-09-16 10:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] [media]: OMAP_VOUT: Don't trigger updates in omap_vout_probe Archit Taneja

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E79C142.80508@ti.com \
    --to=archit@ti.com \
    --cc=hvaibhav@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@ti.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox