From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: timer fixes / cleanup Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:56:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4E92DD63.6090906@ti.com> References: <1317763241-21422-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> <4E8B7C6A.2050207@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:39549 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753886Ab1JJL4b (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:56:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "DebBarma, Tarun Kanti" Cc: "tony@atomide.com" , "Hilman, Kevin" , "paul@pwsan.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On 10/10/2011 12:05 PM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:10 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti > wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >>> Hi Tarun, >>> >>> On 10/4/2011 11:20 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Tony, >>>> >>>> Here is the series to fix the warning and remove the redundant >>>> latency structure that be removed since the timer runtime PM >>>> adaptation was just pulled. >>>> >>>> I was just able to test that on OMAP4. >>> >>> It will be nice if you can test that on the other platforms. >>> In theory, if they are properly using hwmod that should work fine. >> Yes, I will test in other platforms. > I have tested on OMAP2420, OMAP2430 and OMAP3430. Thanks Tarun, Regards, Benoit