Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and JFFS2 oops

Orjan Friberg
2012-01-26T09:26:23Z

On 01/25/2012 10:02 PM, Orjan Friberg wrote:
> That one-liner was boiled down from the following program, which still
> oopses instantly:

The C program seems to work fine with CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y.

If that is indeed the problem I guess it's reasonable that it worked
better with PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY than PREEMPT because there are fewer
preemtion points.

--
Orjan Friberg
FlatFrog Laboratories AB