From: Michael Hunold <hunold@linuxtv.org>
To: Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: omap_hsmmc.c and MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:16:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F267C15.7070704@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGDS+nnVosHsv4SUcGXCieVQG2cjW=mL7DZ7_W2p+uNhUYfPyw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Steve,
on 01/27/2012 03:09 PM Steve Sakoman said the following:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Michael Hunold <hunold@linuxtv.org> wrote:
> Your summary below is a pretty accurate description of the current state.
Ok.
> I've made an attempt at creating a patch for 3.2 that follows David
> Vrabel's original patch series as closely as possible with the new
> structure.
>
> Unfortunately it doesn't quite work. I've only been doing this as a
> background task so progress is pretty slow.
I understand, no problem.
> The patch doesn't seem to break support for memory devices (which is
> good since my rootfs is on an mmc device!) and I do see SDIO
> interrupts occurring and being handled in the debug log, so it is a
> good start:
> However the SDIO device does not function properly due to multiple
> timeout errors, so something is still not quite right.
> Let me know if you would like to help with further development of the
> patch and I will send you a copy. It is rough enough and broken
> enough that it probably isn't yet ready for even an RFC to these
> lists.
Yes, please send them to me. I will give them a try and let you know the
results.
As a side node: actually I'm working double tracked. I plan to use it on
some OMAP-based board like Beagleboard or Pandaboard for a stationary
system, running any kernel that is needed.
But I'd like to use some spare N900s as well, because I can carry them
around easily. But these are running ancient 2.6.28.1 kernels. David
Vrabel mentioned that he originally developed his patches on the N900. I
sent him a mail using his mail address from csr.com, but I have not
received a reply yet.
If you or anybody else has every seen his original patches for the N900
(he did not sent them to any list as far as I know) please let me know
as well.
> Regards,
> Steve
CU
Michael.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-24 14:33 omap_hsmmc.c and MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ Michael Hunold
2012-01-27 14:09 ` Steve Sakoman
2012-01-29 17:37 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-02-08 16:51 ` Steve Sakoman
2012-01-30 11:16 ` Michael Hunold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F267C15.7070704@linuxtv.org \
--to=hunold@linuxtv.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakoman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).