Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] omap hsmmc init cleanup and section warning fixes for v3.4 merge window
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:29:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3E251B.6040404@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3E1ED5.6090305@ti.com>

On Friday 17 February 2012 03:03 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Sorry, I did'nt repond back because I wanted to get this resolved
> completely before I did.
>
> (3) did not probe the inserted mmc device because the driver was
> doing a platform_driver_probe() and not a platform_driver_register().
>
> Once I fixed that and removed the __init from probe, I then hit a
> failure with gpio_to_irq() call in the mmc driver probe.
>
> This was beacuse the twl gpio driver does not register irqs as said by
> this error at driver load...
>  >>>> [   16.217864] twl4030_gpio twl4030_gpio: can't dispatch IRQs from
> modules
> ... apparently because there is no way to unregister a irq once the
> module is unloaded.
>
> That makes sdmmc pretty much unusable if twl gpio is built as a module.
>
>>
>> Tony: I think there's a bug here - if the gpio-twl4030 module is
>> inserted,
>> removed and re-inserted, I think we'll end up creating the devices for
>> MMC
>> twice with the same name, resulting in sysfs complaining very loudly.
>
> I still went ahead and tried (4) becasue I knew I would hit the above
> issue. However I end up with a rmmod complaining 'resource temporarily
> unavailable' because I see there are 3 gpio_requests, which I found
> were from the .setup callback in the board file (I am using beagle).
> The beagle board file does not seem to however register a .teardown
> hook provided by twl4030 gpio platform_data structure to do a gpio_free.
> So I am now trying to get the teardown function clean stuff up including
> unregister the mmc device, which should also fix the problem with
> multiple mmc device register that you reported with insmod/rmmod/insmod
>   sequence.

hmm, rmmod does not even seem to trigger the drivers .remove if there
are outstanding requests on the module, so a pdata->teardown called
from within the .remove does not help to get the gpio_requests done
from the board file cleaned.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-17 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-15 18:28 [PATCH 0/3] omap hsmmc init cleanup and section warning fixes for v3.4 merge window Tony Lindgren
2012-02-15 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP: omap_device: Expose omap_device_{alloc, delete, register} Tony Lindgren
2012-02-15 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Split omap2_hsmmc_init() to properly support I2C GPIO pins Tony Lindgren
2012-02-16 10:03   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-16 10:13     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-16 16:35       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-16 16:46         ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-16 16:51         ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-16 17:06           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-17 18:10             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-16 16:45   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-17 19:05     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-15 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Mark omap_hsmmc_init and omap_mux related functions as __init Tony Lindgren
2012-02-16 10:11   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-16 16:41     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-17 19:17       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-16 12:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] omap hsmmc init cleanup and section warning fixes for v3.4 merge window Nayak, Rajendra
2012-02-16 12:12   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-16 12:34     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-16 13:15       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-16 13:51         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-17  9:14           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-17  9:33             ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-17  9:37               ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-17  9:59               ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-02-17 10:06                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-17 10:18                   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-17 10:26                     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-17 21:23             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-17 14:24 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-17 20:21   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-17 22:37     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-21  5:19     ` Rajendra Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3E251B.6040404@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox