From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Orjan Friberg Subject: Re: Spurious ECC errors with mtd_subpagetest (OMAP3, NAND) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:13:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4F5475A8.3050600@flatfrog.com> References: <4F50F2AB.10209@flatfrog.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hd5b91d02.k46641.sta.perspektivbredband.net ([213.185.29.2]:4399 "EHLO fg-dc1.flatfrog.local" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755989Ab2CEINh (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 03:13:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Grazvydas Ignotas , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" On 03/02/2012 06:17 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > IIRC NAND in mainline was broken for very long time on OMAP3, I think > it was only fixed in 2.6.39.1. That seems to be the case; the 2.6.39.1 diff contains the OMAP NAND sub page write fix (applied locally). Anyone else who can testify on the "volatile-ness" of NAND ECC errors? I.e., are they expected to be more persistent? Thanks, Orjan -- Orjan Friberg FlatFrog Laboratories AB