* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines. [not found] <1330338743-24097-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> @ 2012-04-12 10:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2012-04-12 12:57 ` Cousson, Benoit 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-04-12 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: b-cousson; +Cc: Santosh Shilimkar, linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel Benoit, On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and > can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common > control module header just like other OMAP versions. > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> > --- What do you think about this patch ? Regards Santosh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines. 2012-04-12 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-04-12 12:57 ` Cousson, Benoit 2012-04-16 9:34 ` Santosh Shilimkar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Cousson, Benoit @ 2012-04-12 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Santosh Shilimkar; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel Hi Santosh, On 4/12/2012 12:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Benoit, > > On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and >> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common >> control module header just like other OMAP versions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> >> --- > > What do you think about this patch ? I'm fine with it. I'm just wondering if we have to send it right now or along with the control module driver implementation we've just started. Regards, Benoit ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines. 2012-04-12 12:57 ` Cousson, Benoit @ 2012-04-16 9:34 ` Santosh Shilimkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-04-16 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cousson, Benoit; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-arm-kernel On Thursday 12 April 2012 06:27 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Hi Santosh, > > On 4/12/2012 12:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Benoit, >> >> On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and >>> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common >>> control module header just like other OMAP versions. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> >>> --- >> >> What do you think about this patch ? > > I'm fine with it. I'm just wondering if we have to send it right now or > along with the control module driver implementation we've just started. > Let's do that as part of the driver implementation. Regards Santosh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-16 9:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1330338743-24097-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2012-04-12 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-12 12:57 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-04-16 9:34 ` Santosh Shilimkar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).