From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] ARM: OMAP4: PM: save/restore all DPLL settings in OFF mode Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:09:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4F957EB2.9080200@ti.com> References: <1334914432-26456-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1334914432-26456-2-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:58897 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752901Ab2DXOhV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1334914432-26456-2-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tero Kristo Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, paul@pwsan.com, Nishanth Menon , Rajendra Nayak , Santosh Shilimkar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Tero, On 04/20/2012 04:33 AM, Tero Kristo wrote: [...] > +/** > + * omap4_dpll_print_reg - dump out a single DPLL register value > + * @dpll_reg: register to dump > + * @name: name of the register > + * @tuple: content of the register > + * > + * Helper dump function to print out a DPLL register value in case > + * of restore failures. > + */ > +static void omap4_dpll_print_reg(struct omap4_dpll_regs *dpll_reg, char *name, > + struct dpll_reg *tuple) > +{ > + if (tuple->offset) > + pr_warn("%s - Address offset = 0x%08x, value=0x%08x\n", name, > + tuple->offset, tuple->val); Minor nit-pick here ... 1. Offset is 16-bits and so we can just have "offset = 0x%04x" 2. Consider dropping "Address" from "Address offset" 3. Can we be consistent in our spaces for "offset = " and "value="? > +} > + > +/* > + * omap4_dpll_dump_regs - dump out DPLL registers > + * @dpll_reg: DPLL to dump > + * > + * Dump out the contents of the registers for a DPLL. Called if a > + * restore for DPLL fails to lock. > + */ > +static void omap4_dpll_dump_regs(struct omap4_dpll_regs *dpll_reg) > +{ > + pr_warn("%s: Unable to lock dpll %s[part=%x inst=%x]:\n", > + __func__, dpll_reg->name, dpll_reg->mod_partition, > + dpll_reg->mod_inst); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "clksel", &dpll_reg->clksel); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "div_m2", &dpll_reg->div_m2); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "div_m3", &dpll_reg->div_m3); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "div_m4", &dpll_reg->div_m4); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "div_m5", &dpll_reg->div_m5); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "div_m6", &dpll_reg->div_m6); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "div_m7", &dpll_reg->div_m7); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "clkdcoldo", &dpll_reg->clkdcoldo); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "clkmode", &dpll_reg->clkmode); > + omap4_dpll_print_reg(dpll_reg, "autoidle", &dpll_reg->autoidle); > + if (dpll_reg->idlest.offset) > + pr_warn("idlest - Address offset = 0x%08x, before val=0x%08x" > + " after = 0x%08x\n", dpll_reg->idlest.offset, > + dpll_reg->idlest.val, > + omap4_dpll_read_reg(dpll_reg, &dpll_reg->idlest)); Nit-pick ... 1. Same comments as above 2. Consider dropping "Address offset" altogether here as we print "idlest" the offset should be implied. 3. Also can we be consistent in our naming of "before val and "after"? For example, "val before =" and "val now = ". Cheers Jon