From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net"
<oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Lik Lik <lik88888@gmail.com>,
"eranian@gmail.com" <eranian@gmail.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 16:45:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAAE564.6040708@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FAAC549.6010206@ti.com>
Hi All,
On 05/09/2012 02:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
[...]
>>>>> No hacking intended here, just getting the flags correct ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> So let me start from the beginning ...
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. I agree that for the EMU CD that the valid HW states are HW_AUTO and
>>>>> SW_WKUP.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. When the EMU CD is active (due to something like PMU), we want to
>>>>> keep the CD in the SW_WKUP state, otherwise we can automatically
>>>>> transition to idle and reset the IP (at least for omap4430).
>>>>
>>>>> 3. When the EMU CD is inactive, we want to keep the CD in the HW_AUTO
>>>>> state because SW_SLEEP is NOT supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the current code, we have the CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO flag disabled
>>>>> and the CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO flag enabled. If CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO is
>>>>> set then the omap_pm_clkdms_setup() function will place the CD into
>>>>> HW_AUTO regardless of CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO, and the next time the
>>>>> hwmod _enable() is called it is in the HW_AUTO state and so it is
>>>>> allowed to idle. This is not what we want. Do you agree?
>>>>>
>>>>> If I set CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO flag and disable CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO,
>>>>> then I do not have the above problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> To be honest, with you the more I look and test the code, the more
>>>>> confused I am by the definition of the CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP ...
>>>>>
>>>>> #define CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP (CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO | CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO)
>>>>>
>>>>> When I look at where these flags are used, I see that
>>>>> CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO is used in clkdm_allow_idle and
>>>>> CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO is used in clkdm_deny_idle. So this implies that ...
>>>>>
>>>>> CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO = Supports HW_AUTO state when CD is active
>>>>> CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO = Does NOT supports HW_AUTO state when CD is active
>>>>>
>>>>> Are the above the correct definitions?
>>>>
>>>> Not quite.
>>>>
>>>> These flags describe the capabilities as defined in CLKTRCTRL field of
>>>> the CLKSTCTRL register (e.g. CM_EMU_CLKSTCTRL)
>>>>
>>>> CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO: IP supports HW_AUTO state (and it can be enabled)
>>>> CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO: HW_AUTO feature can be disabled (a.k.a. NO_SLEEP)
>>>>
>>>> Note that in OMAP4, the latter called NO_SLEEP in the TRM, but in OMAP3
>>>> it's described as "The automatic hardware-supervised mode is disabled"
>>>
>>> Yeah, in fact this is the source of the current confusion for my point of view.
>>>
>>> We chat about that with Paul some time back.
>>>
>>> EMU CD does support HW_AUTO and SW_WKUP, so it means that if you want to disable the AUTO mode you can use the SW_WKUP.
>>> Assuming that CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO is equivalent to NO_SLEEP is thus not correct. In fact any state != HW_AUTO should be considered a non-automatic mode.
>>> So EMU does support CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO, CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO and CLKDM_CAN_FORCE_WAKEUP.
>>>
>>> But the way it is implemented does not really allow that, because disable hwsup imply setting state to OMAP34XX_CLKSTCTRL_DISABLE_AUTO.
>>>
>>> void omap4_cminst_clkdm_disable_hwsup(u8 part, s16 inst, u16 cdoffs)
>>> {
>>> _clktrctrl_write(OMAP34XX_CLKSTCTRL_DISABLE_AUTO, part, inst, cdoffs);
>>> }
>>>
>>> So if we want to allow that, some code change are needed in order to set the clkdm mode to OMAP34XX_CLKSTCTRL_FORCE_WAKEUP if OMAP34XX_CLKSTCTRL_DISABLE_AUTO is not supported.
>>>
>>>> What is confusing to me is that the OMAP4 TRM doesn't list the NO_SLEEP
>>>> mode as supported by the EMU. It seems to me that if the IP supports
>>>> HW_AUTO, it should be able to be enabled *and* disabled.
>>>
>>> No, not really, this is mostly OMAP3 legacy, and we do have plan to remove these useless modes going forward. We can effectively disable AUTO mode by going to FORCE_WAKEUP.
>>>
>>> - 0x0 NO_SLEEP A clock domain sleep transition is never initiated, irrespective of the hardware conditions.
>>> - 0x1 SW_SLEEP A software-forced sleep transition. The transition is initiated when the associated hardware conditions are satisfied
>>> - 0x2 SW_WKUP A software-forced clock domain wake-up transition is initiated, irrespective of the hardware conditions.
>>> - 0x3 HW_AUTO Hardware-controlled automatic sleep and wake-up transition is initiated by the PRCM module when the associated hardware conditions are satisfied
>>>
>>>
>>> On OMAP4, SW_SLEEP is equivalent to ENABLE_AUTO and
>>> NO_SLEEP is equivalent to SW_WKUP. There are some slight differences inside the HW, but in term of functionality this is mostly equivalent.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bottom-line, if we fix the omap4_cminst_clkdm_disable_hwsup, we can consider that the EMU CD does support CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO, CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO and CLKDM_CAN_FORCE_WAKEUP, which is equivalent to CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP | CLKDM_CAN_FORCE_WAKEUP.
>>
>> Per our discussion and just to re-iterate here for OMAP4+ devices, we
>> should have ...
>>
>> CAN_DISABLE_AUTO --> SW_WKUP
>> CAN_ENABLE_AUTO --> HW_AUTO
>> CAN_FORCE_WAKEUP --> SW_WKUP
>> CAN_FORCE_SLEEP --> HW_AUTO
>>
>> Hence, the NO_SLEEP and SW_SLEEP should not be used for OMAP4+ (per the
>> equivalents highlighted above). At least that is the current theory :-)
>
> I realise now the the l4cfg CD does not support SW_WKUP and so I guess
> we still need NO_SLEEP in that case. So that would break the above
> mapping and we would have to handle it in software.
I have posted my latest series here [1] based upon that from Will [2]
which attempts to fix the EMU CD based upon the inputs from this thread.
It is working on my omap4460 panda. Hopefully Ming and/or Will can also
test. I know that Ming is out this week but said he can test next week.
Cheers
Jon
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=133659938028348&w=2
[2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git perf/omap4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAAO=S0+L2Q1YZC-pfm2Lz8jPooTeHYOMaZbtRgHYFoL_m7rvhA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4F0B182D.7060507@us.ibm.com>
2012-01-09 22:49 ` oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter Will Deacon
2012-01-09 23:30 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-10 0:46 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-18 4:18 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 9:33 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 11:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-18 12:24 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 12:33 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-03 9:25 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-03 9:42 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-03 9:47 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-03 10:01 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-03 12:34 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-03 12:41 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-03 14:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-03 16:07 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-03 23:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-03 23:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-04 3:42 ` Ming Lei
2012-04-04 11:15 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-26 18:07 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-30 22:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:27 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-04 22:17 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-07 17:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 19:53 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-07 23:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 11:01 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-08 11:23 ` Jean Pihet
2012-05-08 12:37 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-08 13:18 ` Jean Pihet
2012-05-08 14:00 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 14:03 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-08 16:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 19:51 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-08 21:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 22:20 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-08 22:12 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-08 17:31 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-08 21:22 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 23:59 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-09 10:58 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-09 18:04 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-09 19:28 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-09 21:45 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-05-10 8:44 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-10 9:12 ` stephane eranian
2012-05-10 18:55 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-11 12:25 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-11 13:47 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-11 13:49 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-11 14:52 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-11 15:02 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-11 16:31 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-11 16:38 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-11 23:51 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-15 13:52 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-10 14:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-10 19:05 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-10 6:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-05-08 21:50 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-04 0:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-04 11:07 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-18 9:54 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-18 10:07 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 21:58 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 1:21 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 11:34 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 12:45 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 12:51 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 12:55 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 13:14 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 13:26 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 13:32 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 13:51 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 17:07 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-20 13:47 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-21 3:25 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-21 9:16 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 12:45 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 12:56 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-01-27 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 13:32 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 13:47 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-01-27 13:56 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 14:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-01-27 14:09 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-27 15:45 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 15:57 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 17:03 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 17:10 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 17:16 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-29 17:36 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 9:40 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-30 10:24 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 13:43 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 14:49 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-30 16:02 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 16:08 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-01-30 17:15 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 17:24 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-30 17:45 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 19:14 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-30 20:45 ` stephane eranian
2012-03-07 2:49 ` Ming Lei
2012-03-07 9:48 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 14:06 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 10:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FAAE564.6040708@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=lik88888@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).