From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>,
"oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net"
<oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Lik Lik <lik88888@gmail.com>,
"eranian@gmail.com" <eranian@gmail.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:29:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAB6738.9060408@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FAA4DB9.8060504@ti.com>
Benoit,
On Wednesday 09 May 2012 04:28 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Kevin and Jon,
>
> On 5/8/2012 11:22 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Jon Hunter<jon-hunter@ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Benoit,
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2012 06:01 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>> P.S. Please note there is also already a different fix in mainline for
>>>>>>> the EMU clkdm data from Paul which adds the force wakeup flag and
>>>>>>> removes the DISABLE_AUTO flag[1] (but leaves the ENABLE_AUTO flag,
>>>>>>> because the hardware is capable.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm ... yes saw this, and you will have to excuse me as I don't fully
>>>>>> follow the logic here. In fact, I am thinking we want the opposite ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From looking, into this it seems to me that when PMU is running we want
>>>>>> the EMU clock domain in software-wakeup state and when PMU is not
>>>>>> running we want in the hardware auto state.
>>>>>
>>>>> So far, I'm with you.
>>>>>
>>>>>> By keeping the ENABLE_AUTO flag set, as soon as we enable the clock
>>>>>> domain it is put right back into the HW_AUTO state
>>>>>
>>>>> This is only because it was in the HWSUP state when _enable was called.
>>>>> If clkdm_deny_idle() is used, that behavior will change.
>>>>>
>>>>>> and hence PMU is
>>>>>> not working (see _enable() function in
>>>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So really what I think we want is to remove the ENABLE_AUTO flag to keep
>>>>>> the clock domain in software wake-up and use the DISABLE_AUTO flag to
>>>>>> put the clock domain back in HW_AUTO (note this requires a patch to
>>>>>> perform this 2nd part).
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, Paul will have to comment here for the final word, but IIUC, the
>>>>> hwmod flags are supposed to indicate only what the HW is capable of. If
>>>>> we want to change the runtime behavior, we nee to use (or add) APIs to
>>>>> change the beahvior. In this case, clkdm_allow_idle(),
>>>>> clkdm_deny_idle() are probably what is needed here.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, indeed, we should not hack the flags to fix that kind of issue. The
>>>> flags describe what the HW is capable of, and the EMU CD can support
>>>> HW_AUTO and SW_WAKEUP. AFAIK, the issue with that EMU CD is that the
>>>> only valid next power state is OFF, meaning that no retention mode is
>>>> supported. So any transition to idle will go to OFF and lead to a reset
>>>> upon wakeup.
>>>
>>> No hacking intended here, just getting the flags correct ;-)
>>>
>>> So let me start from the beginning ...
>>>
>>> 1. I agree that for the EMU CD that the valid HW states are HW_AUTO and
>>> SW_WKUP.
>>>
>>> 2. When the EMU CD is active (due to something like PMU), we want to
>>> keep the CD in the SW_WKUP state, otherwise we can automatically
>>> transition to idle and reset the IP (at least for omap4430).
>>
>>> 3. When the EMU CD is inactive, we want to keep the CD in the HW_AUTO
>>> state because SW_SLEEP is NOT supported.
>>>
>>> In the current code, we have the CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO flag disabled
>>> and the CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO flag enabled. If CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO is
>>> set then the omap_pm_clkdms_setup() function will place the CD into
>>> HW_AUTO regardless of CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO, and the next time the
>>> hwmod _enable() is called it is in the HW_AUTO state and so it is
>>> allowed to idle. This is not what we want. Do you agree?
>>>
>>> If I set CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO flag and disable CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO,
>>> then I do not have the above problem.
>>>
>>> To be honest, with you the more I look and test the code, the more
>>> confused I am by the definition of the CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP ...
>>>
>>> #define CLKDM_CAN_HWSUP (CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO | CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO)
>>>
>>> When I look at where these flags are used, I see that
>>> CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO is used in clkdm_allow_idle and
>>> CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO is used in clkdm_deny_idle. So this implies that ...
>>>
>>> CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO = Supports HW_AUTO state when CD is active
>>> CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO = Does NOT supports HW_AUTO state when CD is active
>>>
>>> Are the above the correct definitions?
>>
>> Not quite.
>>
>> These flags describe the capabilities as defined in CLKTRCTRL field of
>> the CLKSTCTRL register (e.g. CM_EMU_CLKSTCTRL)
>>
>> CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO: IP supports HW_AUTO state (and it can be enabled)
>> CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO: HW_AUTO feature can be disabled (a.k.a. NO_SLEEP)
>>
>> Note that in OMAP4, the latter called NO_SLEEP in the TRM, but in OMAP3
>> it's described as "The automatic hardware-supervised mode is disabled"
>
> Yeah, in fact this is the source of the current confusion for my point of view.
>
> We chat about that with Paul some time back.
>
> EMU CD does support HW_AUTO and SW_WKUP, so it means that if you want to disable the AUTO mode you can use the SW_WKUP.
> Assuming that CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO is equivalent to NO_SLEEP is thus not correct. In fact any state != HW_AUTO should be considered a non-automatic mode.
> So EMU does support CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO, CLKDM_CAN_DISABLE_AUTO and CLKDM_CAN_FORCE_WAKEUP.
>
> But the way it is implemented does not really allow that, because disable hwsup imply setting state to OMAP34XX_CLKSTCTRL_DISABLE_AUTO.
>
> void omap4_cminst_clkdm_disable_hwsup(u8 part, s16 inst, u16 cdoffs)
> {
> _clktrctrl_write(OMAP34XX_CLKSTCTRL_DISABLE_AUTO, part, inst, cdoffs);
> }
>
> So if we want to allow that, some code change are needed in order to set the clkdm mode to OMAP34XX_CLKSTCTRL_FORCE_WAKEUP if OMAP34XX_CLKSTCTRL_DISABLE_AUTO is not supported.
>
>> What is confusing to me is that the OMAP4 TRM doesn't list the NO_SLEEP
>> mode as supported by the EMU. It seems to me that if the IP supports
>> HW_AUTO, it should be able to be enabled *and* disabled.
>
> No, not really, this is mostly OMAP3 legacy, and we do have plan to remove these useless modes going forward. We can effectively disable AUTO mode by going to FORCE_WAKEUP.
>
> - 0x0 NO_SLEEP A clock domain sleep transition is never initiated, irrespective of the hardware conditions.
> - 0x1 SW_SLEEP A software-forced sleep transition. The transition is initiated when the associated hardware conditions are satisfied
Is the second statement correct ?
How about static/dynamic deps. Does SW_SLEEP honour that like HW_AUTO ?
Regards
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-10 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAAO=S0+L2Q1YZC-pfm2Lz8jPooTeHYOMaZbtRgHYFoL_m7rvhA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4F0B182D.7060507@us.ibm.com>
2012-01-09 22:49 ` oprofile and ARM A9 hardware counter Will Deacon
2012-01-09 23:30 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-10 0:46 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-18 4:18 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 9:33 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 11:39 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-18 12:24 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 12:33 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-03 9:25 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-03 9:42 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-03 9:47 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-03 10:01 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-03 12:34 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-03 12:41 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-03 14:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-03 16:07 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-03 23:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-03 23:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-04 3:42 ` Ming Lei
2012-04-04 11:15 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-26 18:07 ` Will Deacon
2012-04-30 22:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:27 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-04 22:17 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-07 17:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 19:53 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-07 23:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 11:01 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-08 11:23 ` Jean Pihet
2012-05-08 12:37 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-08 13:18 ` Jean Pihet
2012-05-08 14:00 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 14:03 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-08 16:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 19:51 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-08 21:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 22:20 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-08 22:12 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-08 17:31 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-08 21:22 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 23:59 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-09 10:58 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-09 18:04 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-09 19:28 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-09 21:45 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-10 8:44 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-10 9:12 ` stephane eranian
2012-05-10 18:55 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-11 12:25 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-11 13:47 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-11 13:49 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-11 14:52 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-11 15:02 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-11 16:31 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-11 16:38 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-11 23:51 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-15 13:52 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-10 14:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-10 19:05 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-10 6:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2012-05-08 21:50 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-04 0:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-04 11:07 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-18 9:54 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-18 10:07 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 21:58 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 1:21 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 11:34 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 12:45 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 12:51 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 12:55 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 13:14 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 13:26 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 13:32 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-19 13:51 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-19 17:07 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-20 13:47 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-21 3:25 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-21 9:16 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 12:13 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 12:45 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 12:56 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-01-27 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 13:32 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 13:47 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-01-27 13:56 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 14:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-01-27 14:09 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-27 15:45 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 15:57 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 17:03 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-27 17:10 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 17:16 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-29 17:36 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 9:40 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-30 10:24 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 13:43 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 14:49 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-30 16:02 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 16:08 ` Måns Rullgård
2012-01-30 17:15 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 17:24 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-30 17:45 ` stephane eranian
2012-01-30 19:14 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-30 20:45 ` stephane eranian
2012-03-07 2:49 ` Ming Lei
2012-03-07 9:48 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-27 14:06 ` Ming Lei
2012-01-18 10:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FAB6738.9060408@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=lik88888@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).