From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm: omap4: create pmu device via hwmod
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:52:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBA1072.1030007@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB6BA70.6000608@ti.com>
Hi Jon,
On 5/18/2012 11:09 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On 05/10/2012 04:56 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>> Hi Jon& Ming,
>>
>> On 5/9/2012 11:35 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> From: Ming Lei<ming.lei@canonical.com>
>>>
>>> The following modules is required to be enabled before configuring
>>> cross trigger interface for enabling pmu irq:
>>>
>>> l3_instr, l3_main_3, debugss
>>>
>>> so build the arm-pmu device via the three hwmods.
>>>
>>> Cc: Ming Lei<ming.lei@canonical.com>
>>> Cc: Will Deacon<will.deacon@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Paul Walmsley<paul@pwsan.com>
>>> Cc: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei<ming.lei@canonical.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon<will.deacon@arm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter<jon-hunter@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 61
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
>>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
>>> index 58682d1..d75b7d3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
>>> @@ -423,14 +423,67 @@ static struct platform_device omap_pmu_device = {
>>> .num_resources = 1,
>>> };
>>>
>>> -static void omap_init_pmu(void)
>>> +static struct arm_pmu_platdata omap4_pmu_data;
>>> +static struct omap_device_pm_latency omap_pmu_latency[] = {
>>> + [0] = {
>>> + .deactivate_func = omap_device_idle_hwmods,
>>> + .activate_func = omap_device_enable_hwmods,
>>> + .flags = OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST,
>>> + },
>>> +};
>>
>> You can get rid of that, and use a NULL value during
>> omap_device_build_ss. It will use the default value automatically.
>
> I have removed this now for V2.
>
>>> +static struct platform_device* __init omap4_init_pmu(void)
>>> {
>>> - if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>> + int id = -1;
>>> + const char *hw;
>>> + struct platform_device *pd;
>>> + struct omap_hwmod* oh[3];
>>> + char *dev_name = "arm-pmu";
>>> +
>>> + hw = "l3_main_3";
>>> + oh[0] = omap_hwmod_lookup(hw);
>>> + if (!oh[0]) {
>>> + pr_err("Could not look up %s hwmod\n", hw);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> + hw = "l3_instr";
>>> + oh[1] = omap_hwmod_lookup(hw);
>>> + if (!oh[1]) {
>>> + pr_err("Could not look up %s hwmod\n", hw);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> + hw = "debugss";
>>> + oh[2] = omap_hwmod_lookup(hw);
>>> + if (!oh[2]) {
>>> + pr_err("Could not look up %s hwmod\n", hw);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + pd = omap_device_build_ss(dev_name, id, oh, 3,&omap4_pmu_data,
>>> + sizeof(omap4_pmu_data),
>>> + omap_pmu_latency,
>>> + ARRAY_SIZE(omap_pmu_latency), 0);
>>> + WARN(IS_ERR(pd), "Can't build omap_device for %s.\n",
>>> + dev_name);
>>> + return pd;
>>> +}
>>> +static void __init omap_init_pmu(void)
>>> +{
>>> + if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
>>> omap_pmu_device.resource =&omap2_pmu_resource;
>>
>> Ideally, OMAP2 and 3 should use the hwmod device creation as well.
>
> Do you know for OMAP2/3 what hwmods are needed for PMU support? Is it
> just the MPU?
Well, in fact I don't have a clue, but I assume the same kind of DEBUGSS
IPs should be there as well.
> I see two options here for OMAP2/3 ...
>
> 1. Add the appropriate PMU interrupts to the MPU HWMOD and use the MPU
> HWMOD to build the pmu device.
> 2. Create a new PMU HWMOD for OMAP2/3.
I don't really know how the PMU is accessible in OMAP2 & 3. If, it is
via an internal MPU bus without any PRCM control, it will not worst
adding a hwmod for it.
Benoit
> Please note that for 4460, I can get PMU to work without needing the EMU
> PD if I use the PMU interrupts and not CTI. So this really simplifies
> matters for 4460 (and 4470). For 4460 I have created the PMU device by
> just using the MPU HWMOD and adding the PMU interrupts to the MPU HWMOD.
>
> Cheers
> Jon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-21 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 21:35 [PATCH 2/6] arm: omap4: create pmu device via hwmod Jon Hunter
2012-05-10 6:17 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-10 9:56 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-05-18 21:09 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-21 9:52 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBA1072.1030007@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox