From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP4: PMU: Add runtime PM support
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 10:04:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC78862.5010101@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pq9l7306.fsf@ti.com>
Hi Kevin,
On 05/30/2012 04:50 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
[...]
> I'm guessing you probably know my thoughts since you've already thought
> through how this should probably look.
>
> Basically, I don't like the result when we have to hack around missing
> runtime PM support for a driver, so IMO, the driver should be updated.
>
> IOW, it looks to me like the armpmu driver should grow runtime PM
> support. The current armpmu_release|reserve should probably be replaced
> with runtime PM get/put, and the functionality in those functions would
> be the runtime PM callbacks instead.
>
> Will, any objections to armpmu growing runtime PM support?
>
> Kevin
>
> P.S. Jon, for readability sake, any objections to moving the PMU device init
> out of devices.c into pmu.c? devices.c is awful crowded.
No objections. I am guessing that pmu was not supported back in the ARM9
days and so this is only really specific to omap2 devices. That being
said, should this still go into plat-omap dir or just mach-omap2?
Cheers
Jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 21:35 [PATCH 4/6] ARM: OMAP4: PMU: Add runtime PM support Jon Hunter
2012-05-10 6:21 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-05-15 4:53 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-15 14:39 ` Jon Hunter
[not found] ` <CACVXFVNqWM7G8dK2AA90JPvE6e_L0_Zwk-BJTjThY+nZ6ONnQA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-16 8:17 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-17 5:28 ` Ming Lei
2012-05-29 21:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-29 22:07 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-29 22:27 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-30 21:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-31 1:29 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-31 15:05 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-31 18:49 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-31 18:11 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-31 20:42 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-31 21:23 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-31 22:36 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-31 23:02 ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-01 0:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-06-01 14:42 ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-02 16:42 ` Will Deacon
2012-06-04 21:44 ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-05 13:19 ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-06 17:33 ` Will Deacon
2012-06-07 1:24 ` Jon Hunter
2012-05-31 15:04 ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-05-31 16:22 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC78862.5010101@ti.com \
--to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).