From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT 2/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: call pre/post transition per powerdomain
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:51:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE0AE02.20506@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335277420-29124-3-git-send-email-khilman@ti.com>
On 04/24/2012 07:23 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> We only need to call the pre/post transtion methods when we know the
> power state is changing. First, split up the pre/post transition
> calls to be per-powerdomain, and then make them conditional on whether
> the power domain is actually changing states.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com>
This patch introduced a regression where the transition counts for NEON
were no longer accurate because I forgot to call the notifiers for NEON
when calling them for MPU.
The diff below will be folded into this patch before submitting for v3.6.
Kevin
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index 8bd7daf..6226d10 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -306,8 +306,10 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
omap3_enable_io_chain();
}
- if (mpu_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON)
+ if (mpu_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON) {
pwrdm_pre_transition(mpu_pwrdm);
+ pwrdm_pre_transition(neon_pwrdm);
+ }
/* PER */
if (per_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON) {
@@ -391,8 +393,10 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
omap3_disable_io_chain();
}
- if (mpu_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON)
+ if (mpu_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON) {
pwrdm_post_transition(mpu_pwrdm);
+ pwrdm_post_transition(neon_pwrdm);
+ }
}
static void omap3_pm_idle(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-24 14:23 [PATCH/RFT 0/3] ARM: OMAP: PM: reduce overhead of pwrdm pre/post transitions Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFT 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain: allow pre/post transtion to be per pwrdm Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24 14:31 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-25 8:44 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-26 3:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-26 13:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFT 2/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: call pre/post transition per powerdomain Kevin Hilman
2012-06-19 16:51 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-04-24 14:23 ` [PATCH/RFT 3/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: cleanup cam_pwrdm leftovers Kevin Hilman
2012-04-27 7:20 ` Tero Kristo
2012-04-27 20:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-28 14:47 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-04-30 20:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24 23:01 ` [PATCH/RFT 0/3] ARM: OMAP: PM: reduce overhead of pwrdm pre/post transitions Grazvydas Ignotas
2012-04-25 13:24 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE0AE02.20506@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).