From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: cpuidle: optimize the clkdm idle latency in C1 state
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:49:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE187A8.8060203@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338563468-31403-4-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>
Hi Jean,
On Friday 01 June 2012 08:41 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> For a power domain to idle all the clock domains in it must idle.
> This patch implements an optimization of the cpuidle code by
> denying and later allowing only the first registered clock domain
> of a power domain, and so optimizes the latency of the low power code.
How much do we really save doing this? I understand what you are doing
by looking at the patch but the changelog seems very confusing.
What the patch does is get rid of a few function indirection
and assumes there is only *one* clkdm for mpu and core. Is that right?
regards,
Rajendra
>
> The functions _cpuidle_allow_idle and _cpuidle_deny_idle are
> not used anymore and so are removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 22 ++++------------------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> index 2e2f1c6..e6ae3fe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
> @@ -77,20 +77,6 @@ static struct omap3_idle_statedata omap3_idle_data[] = {
>
> static struct powerdomain *mpu_pd, *core_pd, *per_pd, *cam_pd;
>
> -static int _cpuidle_allow_idle(struct powerdomain *pwrdm,
> - struct clockdomain *clkdm)
> -{
> - clkdm_allow_idle(clkdm);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int _cpuidle_deny_idle(struct powerdomain *pwrdm,
> - struct clockdomain *clkdm)
> -{
> - clkdm_deny_idle(clkdm);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int __omap3_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> int index)
> @@ -108,8 +94,8 @@ static int __omap3_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>
> /* Deny idle for C1 */
> if (index == 0) {
> - pwrdm_for_each_clkdm(mpu_pd, _cpuidle_deny_idle);
> - pwrdm_for_each_clkdm(core_pd, _cpuidle_deny_idle);
> + clkdm_deny_idle(mpu_pd->pwrdm_clkdms[0]);
> + clkdm_deny_idle(core_pd->pwrdm_clkdms[0]);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -131,8 +117,8 @@ static int __omap3_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>
> /* Re-allow idle for C1 */
> if (index == 0) {
> - pwrdm_for_each_clkdm(mpu_pd, _cpuidle_allow_idle);
> - pwrdm_for_each_clkdm(core_pd, _cpuidle_allow_idle);
> + clkdm_allow_idle(mpu_pd->pwrdm_clkdms[0]);
> + clkdm_allow_idle(core_pd->pwrdm_clkdms[0]);
> }
>
> return_sleep_time:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 15:11 [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: optimize cpuidle C1 state latency Jean Pihet
2012-06-01 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: cpuidle: default to C1 in next_valid_state Jean Pihet
2012-06-01 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: cpuidle: optimize the PER latency in C1 state Jean Pihet
2012-06-01 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: cpuidle: optimize the clkdm idle " Jean Pihet
2012-06-20 8:19 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-06-20 8:31 ` Jean Pihet
2012-06-20 8:46 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-20 8:52 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-20 8:57 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-20 11:34 ` Jean Pihet
2012-06-28 18:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-06-01 16:26 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARM: OMAP3: PM: optimize cpuidle C1 state latency Kevin Hilman
2012-06-01 16:29 ` Jean Pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE187A8.8060203@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=notasas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox