From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/29] ARM: omap: clk: use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:19:50 +0530 Message-ID: <4FE2B5FE.9010101@ti.com> References: <1339678038-23082-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1339678038-23082-5-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20120614191147.GP19410@gmail.com> <4FDAC07A.7020702@ti.com> <20120620114149.GG12766@atomide.com> <4FE2B2C6.4010904@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.71]:51698 "EHLO na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755358Ab2FUFt6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:49:58 -0400 Received: by obfk16 with SMTP id k16so1004554obf.1 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:49:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Tony Lindgren , Mike Turquette , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thursday 21 June 2012 11:13 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >> Paul, are you ok to look at them as preparatory patches for CCF >> conversion too? > > Yes. Also it looks like some of these patches should go through Mike > since they add features to the CCF, so it's probably best to break those > out into a separate series too. ok, thanks will do. > > - Paul