From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] crypto: omap: add clk_prepare and clk_unprepare Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:59:33 +0530 Message-ID: <4FE7F73D.6090402@ti.com> References: <1340372890-10091-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1340372890-10091-9-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog110.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.203]:46130 "EHLO na3sys009aog110.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752113Ab2FYF34 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:29:56 -0400 Received: by pbbrq13 with SMTP id rq13so6243758pbb.8 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:29:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: mturquette@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Herbert Xu On Saturday 23 June 2012 12:28 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >> In preparation of OMAP moving to Common Clk Framework(CCF) add clk_prepare() >> and clk_unprepare() for the omap crypto clocks. > > These drivers should be converted to use runtime PM instead, since that > needs to be done anyway. So if CCF conversion patches get in before these get converted to runtime PM, do we break them? or should CCF conversion for OMAP wait till all remaining drivers get converted to runtime PM? > > > - Paul