From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rajendra Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] memory: emif: add device tree support to emif driver Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:56:15 +0530 Message-ID: <4FE947F7.9030000@ti.com> References: <1339669764-27244-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1339669764-27244-5-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20120614154820.GG17140@kroah.com> <20120625182830.GA23850@kroah.com> <4FE9467A.2050906@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog131.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.247]:35547 "EHLO na3sys009aog131.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756333Ab2FZF0W (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 01:26:22 -0400 Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so7333878obb.38 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:26:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , tony@atomide.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Aneesh V On Tuesday 26 June 2012 10:53 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> On Tuesday 26 June 2012 10:39 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF) >>>>>> > +static const struct of_device_id emif_of_match[] = { >>>>>> > + { .compatible = "ti,emif-4d" }, >>>>>> > + { .compatible = "ti,emif-4d5" }, >>>>>> > + {}, >>>>>> > +}; >>>>>> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, emif_of_match); >>>>>> > +#endif >>>>>> > + >>>>>> > static struct platform_driver emif_driver = { >>>>>> > .remove = __exit_p(emif_remove), >>>>>> > .shutdown = emif_shutdown, >>>>>> > .driver = { >>>>>> > .name = "emif", >>>>>> > +#if defined(CONFIG_OF) >>>>>> > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(emif_of_match), >>>>>> > +#endif >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are these two still #if defined needed? >>>>> >>>>> Also, what about the IS_DEFINED macro? >>>>> >>> >>> Yes. To avoid the build break in !DT build. >>> >> >> No, infact of_match_ptr is there just so you can avoid a >> #ifdef around and not break !CONFIG_OF. > > Need to recheck but the build was throwing error becasue of "emif_of_match" > mostly. You still need the first one. I meant the second one around 'of_match_ptr' should be removed. With !CONFIG_OF, of_match_ptr(_ptr) is just defined as NULL. > Regards > Santosh