linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
To: "zumeng.chen" <zchen@windriver.com>
Cc: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@windriver.com>,
	wim@iguana.be, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Watchdog: OMAP3: fix wrong boot status from wdt reboot
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:09:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF52893.30406@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF467F8.9070804@windriver.com>

Hello,
On Wednesday 04 July 2012 09:27 PM, zumeng.chen wrote:
> To: Shubhrajyoti
> On 2012年07月04日 23:54, Zumeng Chen wrote:
>> Does the following fix make sense?
yes , thanks for the patch.
IIRC Rajendra had a similar one.
Some comments below.
>>
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS always return 0 even if the machine
>> comes from omap-wdt reboot. Because WKUP_MOD is not right
>> for OMAP3,so give the right addr 0xA00 of PRM_RSTST for
>> get_reset_sources, which inputs the signal from omap-wdt
>> reboot, and return 1 when coming from omap-wdt reboot for
>> WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen<zumeng.chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c  |    4 +++-
>>   drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c |    3 +++
>>   drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h |    3 +++
>>   3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> index 480f40a..43f3feb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c
>> @@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ void __iomem *prcm_mpu_base;
>>   u32 omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(void)
>>   {
>>       /* XXX This presumably needs modification for 34XX */
>> -    if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +    if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>           return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)& 
>> 0x7f;
>> +    if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +        return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(0xA00, OMAP2_RM_RSTST)&  0x7f;
>>       if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
>>           return omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(WKUP_MOD, OMAP4_RM_RSTST)& 
>> 0x7f;
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> index 8285d65..ea57078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
>> @@ -234,6 +234,9 @@ static long omap_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file,
>> unsigned int cmd,
>>           if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
>>               return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(),
>>                       (int __user *)arg);
>> +        if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> +            return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources()&  0x10>>
>> +                OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT, (int __user *)arg);
Actually instead of returning yes/no.
The correct  expectation is to return WDIOF_* flags as defined in
include/linux/watchdog.h.

(BTW I agree that was something even current code is not
following).Since you are at it may be that’s
something you can consider.

>>           return put_user(0, (int __user *)arg);
>>       case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE:
>>           pm_runtime_get_sync(wdev->dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> index 09b774c..d8d5daa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.h
>> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
>>   #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_WPS        (0x34)
>>   #define OMAP_WATCHDOG_SPR        (0x48)
>>
>> +/* PRM_RSTST MPU_WD_RST bit */
>> +#define OMAP3_PRM_RSTST_BIT        4
>> +
>>   /* Using the prescaler, the OMAP watchdog could go for many
>>    * months before firing.  These limits work without scaling,
>>    * with the 60 second default assumed by most tools and docs.
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-05  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-04 15:54 [PATCH 1/1] Watchdog: OMAP3: fix wrong boot status from wdt reboot Zumeng Chen
2012-07-04 15:57 ` zumeng.chen
2012-07-05  5:39   ` Shubhrajyoti [this message]
2012-07-05  6:00     ` Zumeng Chen
2012-07-05 13:05 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-07-05 15:03   ` zumeng.chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF52893.30406@ti.com \
    --to=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    --cc=zchen@windriver.com \
    --cc=zumeng.chen@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).