From: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
To: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>,
Avinash Philip <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Subject: OMAP HWMOD: Query regarding parent<->child support
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:41:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5004212C.5030807@ti.com> (raw)
Hi All,
During migration to run-time PM we came across unique (I believe) issue
with respect to CPSW driver and eHRPWM. I am looking for pointers to
handle these use-cases, as I am still going through the code and trying
to understand myself on how can we handle this.
CPSW:
=====
CPSW Subsystem is built with 5 sub-modules,
- CPSW SS (BaseAddr@0x4A100000, rst@0x8)
- MDIO (BaseAddr@0x4A101000)
- CPSW WR (0x4A101200, rst@0x4)
- CPSW SL1 (0x4A100D80, rst@0xc)
- CPSW SL2 (0x4A100DC0, rst@0xc)
- CPSW CPDMA (0x4A100800, rst@0x1c)
Issue1:
-------
IP's are reused from legacy devices, for example, we have 2
separate platform driver for MDIO and cpsw, used between Davinci
and AM335x.
Everything is controlled through one MODULEMODE register in PRCM.
So now we have 2 different modules accessing same resources
(CLKCTRL.MODULEMODE), it is tricky to handle this usecase.
Earlier with clock api's, it was easy, since clock framework used
to handle ref_count for this and was sufficient here but with
migration to runtime PM, we no longer use clk api's.
Option1:
It must be handled at driver level, and there will be
handshaking between both the drivers. Which might impact legacy
devices.
Option2:
It must be handled at SoC level, and parent and child creation
is required here. parent->child creation is possible with
platform device, but not sure about how it can be integrated
with omap_device and hwmod.
I am reading code and trying to understand how can this be
handled? what is right place to create this parent<->child
relation?
Issue2:
-------
Due to one of the HW bug, we have assert ocp-reset 4 sub-modules of
CPSW before disabling clock/module (MODULEMODE=0) everytime.
So for example, in every suspend-resume code before disabling the
module, we have to assert ocp-reset and then disable the module.
Also, please note that, the MDIO driver is separate and independent
and requires clock to access sysconf register.
We can have hwmod_class->reset function here, but the reset offset
is different for every module, which makes it even difficult to
handle.
So if we have parent-child relation at some level, Where, we can
register custom reset function to handle this scenario is required,
like,
CPSW
-> MDIO
-> CPSW WR
-> CPSW SL1
-> CPSW SL2
-> CPDMA
Currently, as part of internal release we implemented in hackish
way, where we pass base address of sub-modules (- 0x8) so that we
can access rst_off in common function with,
omap_hwmod_addr_space->pa_start + class.rst_offs
eHRPWM1/2/3:
============
Here we have same issue as issue1 mentioned above for CPSW. eHRPWM is
built with 2 independent sub-modules (eCAP and HRPWM) with single
resource access (MODULEMODE).
Functionality point-of-view both can work independently, except
clock/module enable disable (which is shared between both).
Will MFD solve this issue? and will it be right approach? Would it
make sense to have MFD for such small small independent drivers?
Thanks,
Vaibhav
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-16 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-16 14:11 Vaibhav Hiremath [this message]
2012-08-17 10:12 ` OMAP HWMOD: Query regarding parent<->child support Vaibhav Hiremath
2012-08-17 12:30 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-08-24 15:51 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-08-31 10:47 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5004212C.5030807@ti.com \
--to=hvaibhav@ti.com \
--cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox