Re: Which git to clone for testing prior to submitting bugs?

[linux@johnea.net]

On 09/28/2012 12:18 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> Ah, so looking at the config, ARCH switched to omapdrm... It kinda
> works in v3.5.x, but i'd wait till a few more releases...
>
> So, based on that config, they have both "CONFIG_FB_OMAP2" and
> "CONFIG_DRM_OMAP" enabled.. That's a no-no...
>
> CONFIG_DRM_OMAP
> http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/DRM_OMAP.html
> depends on: ( CONFIG_DRM&&  ! CONFIG_CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 )&&  (
> CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS )
>
> Option 1: Stay with omapfb
>
> CONFIG_FB_OMAP2=m ->  CONFIG_FB_OMAP2=y
> disable: CONFIG_DRM_OMAP
>
> Option 2: Go Experimental route with omapdrm
>
> CONFIG_DRM_OMAP=m
> CONFIG_DRM_OMAP_NUM_CRTCS=1
>
> disable: CONFIG_FB_OMAP2
>
>> >  Attached are config.gz from running system and gz'd complete dmesg output
>> >  (hope attachments are OK on the list).
>> >
>> >  There's another 3.5.4 build scheduled on the panda build farm this
>> >  afternoon. If you have any config modification suggestions, they'd be very
>> >  gratefully received.
> Also, if your running that config on pre-es (omap4430) panda's..
> CONFIG_OMAP4_ERRATA_I688=y&   CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_BARRIERS=y
>
> and save your self some debugging time...;)
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Robert Nelson http://www.rcn-ee.com/

Thanks Robert!

I passed along to the distro devs to include in today's build.

I'll follow up once I'm running the new version...

johnea