linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: "Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com>
Cc: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	"Hilman, Kevin" <khilman@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: timer: remove CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:47:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <509BFE36.5090700@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EB6872B@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>


On 11/08/2012 12:28 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 23:43:31, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>
>> On 11/08/2012 12:06 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 23:28:53, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/08/2012 11:47 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 23:09:57, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>>> I think you are missing the point here. For OMAP devices we have two
>>>>>> main external clock sources which are the 32kHz clock and the sys_clk
>>>>>> (can be a range of frequencies from 12-38.4MHz for OMAP4). The point is
>>>>>> for OMAP these clock sources are always present and AFAIK there is no
>>>>>> h/w configuration that allows you not to have the 32kHz clock source.
>>>>>> PRCM needs it and I think for OMAP1 the reset logic needs it (if memory
>>>>>> serves).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Igor was mentioning a h/w scenario where the 32kHz source is not
>>>>>> present. However, I am not sure which devices support this and is
>>>>>> applicable too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So we are not discussing the 32k-sync-timer here. We are discussing
>>>>>> whether there are any device configurations where a 32k clock source
>>>>>> would not be available for the gptimer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly that is the point I am trying to make here,
>>>>>
>>>>> In case of AM33xx, it is certainly possible to build the system without 
>>>>> this 32Khz clock. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting point here is, this 32KHz clock is external clock coming from 
>>>>> crystal connected to in-built RTC module.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. Looking at the AM3358 data manual it states ...
>>>>
>>>> "The OSC1 oscillator provides a 32.768-kHz reference clock to the
>>>> real-time clock (RTC) and is connected to the RTC_XTALIN and RTC_XTALOUT
>>>> terminals. OSC1 is disabled by default after power is applied. This
>>>> clock input is optional and may not be required if the RTC is configured
>>>> to receive a clock from the internal 32k RC oscillator (CLK_RC32K) or
>>>> peripheral PLL (CLK_32KHZ) which receives a reference clock from the
>>>> OSC0 input."
>>>>
>>>> So what is clear to me that an external 32k clock source is optional.
>>>> However, it still appears that you will always have an internal 32k
>>>> source and so regardless of the h/w configuration, a gptimer will always
>>>> have an 32k clock available on the AM335x devices. Is that correct?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Internal RC oscillator is not accurate at all, so not guaranteed to give 
>>> accurate 32.768Hz clock. The oscillation band is from 16Khz to 64Khz.
>>>
>>> So it may not be useful as a system clocks, right?
>>
>> So I admit I am not familiar with the details on the AMxxxx stuff side
>> so much.
>>
>> So maybe I should ask this question ...
>>
>> Do you support a configuration where there is no external 32k clock AND
>> the internal oscillator and hence, RTC are not used?
>>
> 
> Why not, you could give-up on persistent time across suspend/resume and use 
> OSC clock as a input clock to timer.
> 
> And the timer code, which we have we have added fallback mechanism for this,
> First make sure that timer is properly set for RTC32K, if yes, then use it, 
> and if no, then fall back to OSC clock.

You mean sync-32k and not rtc32k right? We are just detecting the
presence of the sync-32k counter and if so use it, otherwise use a gptimer.

>> I would have expected that you would always want the RTC running, but if
>> you are saying that you don't require an external 32k and the internal
>> 32k is not accurate, then I assume that having the RTC available is not
>> mandatory either.
>>
> 
> Yes, it is not mandatory, considering fact that, you will not have 
> persistent time and other low-power modes. 
> Actually it depends on board/EVM use-case, right? 

Yes absolutely, just trying to understand if that is a valid use-case or
not. So for AM33xx the external 32k is not mandatory. Thanks.

Jon

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-08 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-07 14:42 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: timer: remove CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER Igor Grinberg
2012-11-07 17:33 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-08  7:13   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-08 16:20     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-08 17:09       ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-11  9:16       ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-12 19:05         ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-13  9:08           ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-12 22:06         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-07 21:36 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-08  7:59   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-08 16:16     ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-08 17:08       ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-08 17:39         ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-08 17:47           ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-08 17:58             ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-08 18:06               ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-08 18:13                 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-08 18:28                   ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-08 18:47                     ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-11-09  0:55                 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-12  6:42                   ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-08 17:58           ` Paul Walmsley
2012-11-08 18:08             ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-08 18:17               ` Paul Walmsley
2012-11-08 18:34                 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-11 11:35                   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-12  6:38                     ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-12  7:24                       ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-12 10:40                         ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-12-10 20:49                     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-12-14 23:58         ` Russ Dill
2012-11-11 11:25       ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-08 18:54     ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-08 18:59       ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-08 19:16         ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-11 11:28           ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-12 19:15             ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-13  9:14               ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-13 16:13                 ` Jon Hunter
2012-11-14  7:23                   ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-12 10:38           ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-11-12 11:01             ` Benoit Cousson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=509BFE36.5090700@ti.com \
    --to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
    --cc=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
    --cc=hvaibhav@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).