From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Neri Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: OMAP: HDMI: Obtain DMA port from resources Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:22:05 -0600 Message-ID: <50A516AD.8000702@ti.com> References: <1352860249-26348-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri@ti.com> <1352860249-26348-4-git-send-email-ricardo.neri@ti.com> <20121114032712.GQ4415@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50A3CFBD.5080903@ti.com> <20121114230848.GA4536@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50A45467.6070404@ti.com> <20121115040141.GC7599@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:60428 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992633Ab2KOQXF (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:23:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121115040141.GC7599@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: lrg@ti.com, s-guiriec@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, "Valkeinen, Tomi" Hi Mark, On 11/14/2012 10:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:33:11PM -0600, Ricardo Neri wrote: >> On 11/14/2012 05:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Don't do this. With a change like this which must be made at the same >>> time over multiple subsystems it is very important that you send all the > >> but the changes will hit linux-next at some point and they could be >> tested there, right? > > This isn't much fun for anyone doing git bisect, it means the device > will be unusuable for large periods of history. > >> Sorry, as changes for the HDMI drivers go to several maintainers, I >> was trying to send the relevant patches to the respective >> maintainers and avoid potential merge/rebase issues. > > You need to make sure everyone involved knows what's going on - review > should really turn up the sort of issue I just highlighted. > >> Tomi has already taken the DSS changes. Perhaps, if you and Tomi >> agree, Tomi could also take the ASoC and the arch/arm/mach-omap2 >> changes. This way all changes come from the same tree. > > Yes, we're going to need to do that. Ideally all the changes would be > squashed into a single commit. OK. Tomi has offered to revert the patch that create the platform device. I will resubmit a new series with all the required changes squashing all the platform devices into a single one. > >>>> This change should be present in K3.8. > >>> What is "K3.8"? > >> I meant that Tomi took the DSS changes in [1] on his master branch >> and he should push them upstream when the merge window for kernel >> v3.8 opens. > > Do you mean that "K3.8" is "v3.8"? Yes, that is what I mean. BR, Ricardo >