From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: Alessio Igor Bogani <alessio.bogani@elettra.trieste.it>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Conditionally compile counter_32k
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:09:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B3781E.3040205@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B36B81.4010709@elettra.trieste.it>
On 11/26/12 15:15, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> On 26/11/2012 13:02, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 11/26/12 11:28, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> [...]
>>> # Common support
>>> -obj-y := sram.o dma.o fb.o counter_32k.o
>>> +obj-y := sram.o dma.o fb.o
>>> obj-m :=
>>> obj-n :=
>>> obj- :=
>>>
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER) += counter_32k.o
>>
>> We are moving away from this config option in favor of runtime detection,
>
> Well, I'll be happy when it'll happen.
>
>> Why do you need this?
>
> Because until now the build system doesn't honour the config file. Indeed it builds that source code file also when I set CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER to n.
>
> The runtime detection isn't a good excuse for doesn't make the build system working like users expect.
So, the problem is the users expectations...
If you look, at Tony's omap-for-v3.8/timer branch,
patch: ARM: OMAP2+: timer: remove CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER
it should change the expectations (at least I tried to do this in Kconfig file).
So, to the question of honoring the config option - yes,
but it is a work in progress on removing that one.
If you have a real issue that you are trying to fix - it is totally different thing,
but if it is just config option honoring... then I don't think we should merge this patch.
--
Regards,
Igor.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-26 9:28 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Conditionally compile counter_32k Alessio Igor Bogani
2012-11-26 12:02 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-11-26 13:15 ` Alessio Igor Bogani
2012-11-26 14:09 ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B3781E.3040205@compulab.co.il \
--to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=alessio.bogani@elettra.trieste.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox