linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
Cc: t-kristo@ti.com, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: OMAP4430 produces boot warnings
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:21:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B4B045.7090603@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B4AA74.1090300@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1056 bytes --]

On 2012-11-27 13:56, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 November 2012 04:53 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

>> Hmm, well this feels like a hack. DISPC driver doesn't know how the DSS
>> modules are arranged, which module belongs to which power domain, etc.
>>
>> If it cannot be fixed in the arch code, I guess we could just have
>> dss_get_ctx_loss_count(void) function which always returns the
>> dss_core's ctx loss count, and define that on all the platforms omapdss
>> is used, the dss_core's ctx loss count is the same as ctx loss count for
>> all the dss submodules.
>>
>> I think the above is true for all OMAPs. But it feels like a hack too,
>> but not as bad as the above patch.
> 
> Yes, a function taking in no platform device in dss's core.c would be
> less hacky. I guess we would need this for now, because a solution in
> omap_hwmod would be more complex and it may not be ready by the merge
> window.

Ok. Can you cook up a patch and test it?

PM guys, does the above sound like an acceptable work-around?

 Tomi



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 899 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-27 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-21 23:03 OMAP4430 produces boot warnings Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-11-22 12:42 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-22 13:42   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-22 14:34     ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-22 14:44       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-23  9:34         ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-26  6:48           ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-26 12:14             ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-27 11:23               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-27 11:56                 ` Archit Taneja
2012-11-27 12:21                   ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-11-27 12:31                     ` Tero Kristo
2012-11-28 10:44                       ` Archit Taneja

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50B4B045.7090603@ti.com \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=archit@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).