From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/23] mfd: omap-usb-host: get rid of cpu_is_omap..() macros Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:34:53 +0200 Message-ID: <50C5ACBD.50105@ti.com> References: <1354630396-24545-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1354630396-24545-2-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20121205184217.GK21682@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:57078 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821Ab2LJJfT (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:35:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121205184217.GK21682@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: balbi@ti.com, keshava_mgowda@ti.com, sshtylyov@mvista.com, bjorn@mork.no, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 12/05/2012 08:42 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Roger Quadros [121204 06:15]: >> Instead of using cpu_is_omap..() macros in the device driver we >> rely on information provided in the platform data. >> >> The only information we need is whether the USB Host module has >> a single ULPI bypass control bit for all ports or individual bypass >> control bits for each port. OMAP3 REV2.1 and earlier have the former. > > Thanks for moving this one earlier in the series. Looks like > you're missing Samuel as the MFD maintainer from your cc. > You should resend again with Samuel Ortiz > added. > > Maybe check the patches in this series with scripts/get_maintainer.pl > to see who all should be cc:ed? > OK, I'll resend this series with appropriate maintainers in cc. regards, -roger