From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: kernel: update cpuinfo to print CPU model name Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:22:50 +0530 Message-ID: <5108B532.6000706@ti.com> References: <1359474865-15408-1-git-send-email-ruslan.bilovol@ti.com> <1359474865-15408-2-git-send-email-ruslan.bilovol@ti.com> <20130129160827.GJ2637@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ruslan Bilovol Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 30 January 2013 04:42 AM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:54:24PM +0200, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: >>> CPU implementer : 0x41 >>> CPU name : OMAP4470 ES1.0 HS >> >> Sigh. No. Look at what you're doing - look carefully at the above. >> >> "CPU implementer" - 0x41. That's A. For ARM Ltd. ARM Ltd implemented >> this CPU. Did ARM Ltd really implement OMAP4470 ? I think TI would be >> very upset if that were to be the case. > > Yes, it would be very surprisingly :) > >> >> So no, OMAP4470 is _NOT_ a CPU. It is a SoC. The CPU inside the SoC is >> a collection of ARM Ltd Cortex A9 _CPUs_. >> >> See? Please, learn what a CPU is as opposed to a SoC. > > Completely agree with you. I will fix this > Thank god you agreed to drop your current approach. Please elaborate what you are going to fix and also state what user-space features changes from OMAP4460 to OMAP4470. Regards, Santosh