From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Add OMAP4 Blaze Tablet support Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:33:39 -0600 Message-ID: <511DE4D3.8020405@ti.com> References: <1360352269-14922-1-git-send-email-ruslan.bilovol@ti.com> <1360352269-14922-2-git-send-email-ruslan.bilovol@ti.com> <20130210025225.GB4801@atomide.com> <51193DE1.6080704@ti.com> <20130211190011.GS4801@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ruslan Bilovol Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 02/13/2013 05:28 PM, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: > Hi Tony, Jon, > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Jon Hunter [130211 10:58]: >>> >>> Please note that the blaze is derived from the omap4-sdp board and so I >>> would hope that we can use the existing for sdp dts and board file for >>> blaze. In fact this is what I do today for basic booting. >>> >>> So unless there is some feature on the blaze that is not compatible with >>> the original sdp, we should just use the sdp dts. >> >> Sounds like we need some common .dts file and separate files >> for sdp, blaze and tablet that include the common .dts file? >> >> There's a different LCD panel at least between blaze and the >> tablet. > > Please note, that, although 'Blaze' board is very close to 'SDP' board, > there are quite big differences comparing to 'Blaze Tablet' board. > At least: > - LCD panels > - touchscreen controllers > - LEDs > - Keypad (on 'Blaze') / gpio keys (on 'Blaze Tablet') > - Sensors > - HS USB Host related stuff SDP also has usb host too (but yes blaze does not). > - cameras (there is no embedded cameras on 'Blaze Tablet' board) > > As per my point of view, next should be done: > 1) Add the DTS file for BlazeTablet board > 2) Figure out what is common for both and move it to some common file > (if that makes sense) > > I'm currently working on step '#1'. So after that step #2 should not > be an issue for us. Sounds good. They all use the same processor boards and so may be that can be common in DT and we can have a dtsi for that. Cheers Jon