Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Afzal Mohammed <afzal@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: omap2: GPMC cleanup
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:25:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5134F52C.1010300@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130304185259.GQ11806@atomide.com>


On 03/04/2013 12:53 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> [130212 11:26]:
>> This patchset is v3 of the small cleanup consisting in:
>>  * mark some functions as 'static' when appropriate
>>  * remove an unused function from gpmc.c
>>  * improve error messages when a CS request fails
>>  * migrate to dev_err and dev_warn
>>
>> Changes from v2:
>>  * add a commit message to some trivial patches,
>>    that omitted it due to author's laziness.
>>
>> Changes from v1:
>>  * fix gpmc_cs_reserved to return a boolean instead
>>    of an integer error code
>>  * add a new patch to the patchset cleaning redundant checks
>>
>> It has been tested on a IGEP v2 board with OneNAND,
>> which means the gpmc-nand patch is tested by compilation only.
>>
>> Altough this patchset is almost trivial,
>> any feedback or testing is more than welcome.
>>
>> Thanks to Jon Hunter for his kind review!
> 
> Looks good to me. Jon, can you please queue all the GPMC related
> patches into one pull request around -rc2 time assuming no more
> comments? 

Yes will do.

Jon

      reply	other threads:[~2013-03-04 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-12 19:22 [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: omap2: GPMC cleanup Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-12 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc: Mark local scoped functions static Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-12 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc: Remove unused gpmc_round_ns_to_ticks() function Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-12 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc: Fix gpmc_cs_reserved() return value Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-12 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc-nand: Print something useful on CS request failure Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-12 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc-onenand: " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-12 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc-onenand: Replace pr_err() with dev_err() Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-12 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc-onenand: Replace printk KERN_ERR with dev_warn() Ezequiel Garcia
2013-02-12 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc: Remove redundant chip select out of range check Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-04 18:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] ARM: omap2: GPMC cleanup Tony Lindgren
2013-03-04 19:25   ` Jon Hunter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5134F52C.1010300@ti.com \
    --to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
    --cc=afzal@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox