From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add device-tree support for NOR flash
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:46:56 -0600
Message-ID: <51377300.3040809@ti.com>
References: <1361899842-30303-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1361899842-30303-12-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <51360271.1030302@mimc.co.uk> <51360562.20309@ti.com> <51361B46.507@mimc.co.uk> <51362BAB.10403@ti.com> <513664EC.2050508@ti.com> <CALF0-+VeU9tGy-dKgmVg1pT0z0ghJBSsughV7kzT5nX7u=9BhA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:50182 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751639Ab3CFQrN (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:47:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CALF0-+VeU9tGy-dKgmVg1pT0z0ghJBSsughV7kzT5nX7u=9BhA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@mimc.co.uk>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>, device-tree <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>, linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>


On 03/06/2013 05:58 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Jon,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>> By the way, with this version you should remove "simple-bus" from your
>> gpmc node compatible strings. I now call of_platform_device_create() to
>> create the child device during the GPMC probe. I think that this is a
>> safer approach.
>>
> 
> FWIW, using of_platform_device_create() works for my driver.
> It seems as simple as using a compatible 'simple-bus',
> with the advantage that it allows to create and probe the
> child device from its parent.

Yes and I think that is safer for these type of drivers.

> I'll submit this driver by the end of this week, in case you want
> to take a look at it.

Ok, but this is not for omap right?

Cheers
Jon