From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ASoC: OMAP2+: Update Audio IP with sDMA binding for DT boot Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:23:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5139AE1D.3080102@ti.com> References: <1362660204-27074-1-git-send-email-s-guiriec@ti.com> <51389023.2000907@ti.com> <20130308092543.c355b2c6235c297efbe162e0@bitmer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:36384 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933331Ab3CHJXx (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2013 04:23:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130308092543.c355b2c6235c297efbe162e0@bitmer.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: Sebastien Guiriec , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Beno=EE?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?t_Cousson?= , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 03/08/2013 08:25 AM, Jarkko Nikula wrote: >> The content of the patches looks about right for me, however I would >> squash together the IP and platform driver patches so we avoid break= age >> within the series. Also I would put the patch for the .dtsi files as >> first one. >>=20 > Looks ok to me too at quick look. Would it be possible to avoid possi= ble > breakage if first patch is divided to omap-pcm.h change which come be= fore > audio link driver changes and do omap-pcm.c change last? If we have them as separate we will have runtime regression between the patches. It is better to have them squashed together. --=20 P=E9ter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html