From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Allow real broadcast device selection instead of always dummy Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:16:06 +0530 Message-ID: <5141AA6E.3020805@ti.com> References: <1363165608-13739-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <514046B6.9020005@ti.com> <20130313101641.GA13483@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <514061D1.20603@ti.com> <20130313122550.GD13483@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <51409EC3.5050905@ti.com> <20130313161811.GF13483@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <5141800A.2000307@ti.com> <20130314102807.GG13483@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:53780 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756728Ab3CNKos (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:44:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130314102807.GG13483@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King , Stephen Boyd On Thursday 14 March 2013 03:58 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:45:14AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Santosh, >>>> >>>> [..] >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is the problem that the dummy timer is being registered as the broadcast >>>>>>> source, or that it is selected as a local timer in preference of real timers? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Dummy timer is preferred over real broadcast timer. >>>>> >>>>> Ok. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>> I do agree it'd be worth lowering the dummy timer's rating to ensure it doesn't >>>>> override a real timer elsewhere. >>>>> >>>> Yep. Can I add you acked-by tag then for $subject patch ? >>>> Would be good to get this one merged as well. >>> >>> Sure. Though could you reword the commit message? The patch solves the more >>> general issue of a dummy being preferred over real hardware even outside of >>> choosing the broadcast device. >>> >>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland >> >> Thanks. For record, patch is in end of the email which I plan >> to put into patch system. >> >> Regards, >> Santosh > > The below patch seems fine. Are you intending for this to go in as a fix for > 3.9-rc*, or as a cleanup for 3.10? > Fix for 3.9-rc*. I have put already it in patch system. Regards, Santosh