From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: video: omap2: dss: Use PTR_RET function Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:08:26 -0500 Message-ID: <5149FB1A.2030608@ti.com> References: <1363680194-10404-1-git-send-email-gheorghiuandru@gmail.com> <5149A3D0.2010902@ti.com> <5149D95D.2030505@ti.com> <5149EAE7.7040800@ti.com> <5149F9B4.2020400@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5149F9B4.2020400@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Alexandru Gheorghiu , Florian Tobias Schandinat , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 03/20/2013 01:02 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 03/20/2013 11:59 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 2013-03-20 17:44, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> >>> On 03/20/2013 06:56 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>>> On 2013-03-19 10:03, Alexandru Gheorghiu wrote: >>>>> Use PTR_RET function instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR. >>>>> Patch found using coccinelle. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c | 5 +---- >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c >>>>> index f8779d4..60cc6fe 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c >>>>> @@ -181,10 +181,7 @@ int dss_debugfs_create_file(const char *name, void (*write)(struct seq_file *)) >>>>> d = debugfs_create_file(name, S_IRUGO, dss_debugfs_dir, >>>>> write, &dss_debug_fops); >>>>> >>>>> - if (IS_ERR(d)) >>>>> - return PTR_ERR(d); >>>>> - >>>>> - return 0; >>>>> + return PTR_RET(d); >>>>> } >>>>> #else /* CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_DEBUGFS */ >>>>> static inline int dss_initialize_debugfs(void) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks. I'll apply to omapdss tree. >>> >>> Is this correct? If debugfs_create_file() returns a valid pointer, then >>> now dss_debugfs_create_file() will return a non-zero value on success. I >>> don't think this is what you want. A similar case came up recently here [1]. >> >> Hmm. I don't follow. And I don't understand the post where you referred. Yes looking at Russell's response I am not sure I following now as it is also using PTR_RET() and not PTR_ERR(). My eyes deceived me on this one. Jon