From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: OMAP4+: Remove the un-necessary cache flush from hotplug code Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 02:17:48 +0530 Message-ID: <51535AF4.3090607@ti.com> References: <1361373527-21695-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1361373527-21695-5-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <87ehf07kfn.fsf@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:44880 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752720Ab3C0Up7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:45:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ehf07kfn.fsf@linaro.org> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thursday 28 March 2013 12:13 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Santosh Shilimkar writes: > >> This was added with intial port where OMAP PM support wasn't existing >> and only simple WFI based hooks were used. >> >> This should have been cleaned up while adding the PM support but some >> how fall through cracks. > > Changelog describes a bit of history, but does not it's no longer > needed. > I thought "This should have been cleaned up while adding PM support" means its no longer needed. At least I meant that way. Anyway I will just make it explicit. Regards, Santosh