From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Ujfalusi Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] ARM: omap2: twl-common update Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:27:37 +0100 Message-ID: <51540D09.7000104@ti.com> References: <5146E895.50709@ti.com> <20130319182336.GE16413@atomide.com> <20130327183822.GC10155@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:36580 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755495Ab3C1J1h (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 05:27:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130327183822.GC10155@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Matthias Brugger , linux-omap , linux-arm-kernel@list.infradead.org Hi Tony, On 03/27/2013 07:38 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Sorry just noticed that this one adds: >=20 > Section mismatch in reference from the variable omap3_power_pdata to = the (unknown reference) .init.data:(unknown) > The variable omap3_power_pdata references > the (unknown reference) __initdata (unknown) > If the reference is valid then annotate the > variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the var= iable: > *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console >=20 > Is it safe to make it __initdata, or should also other power_pdata > have their __initdata flags removed if used by the drivers? We could make the whole stack of struct for the omap3_power_pdata as __initdata since the driver (mfd/twl4030-power) is bool. I resend the patch and update the branch (and rebase on -rc4) at the sa= me time. --=20 P=C3=A9ter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html