linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: khilman@deeprootsystems.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate OMAP4 PM code to re-use it for OMAP5
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:47:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516503EB.8080805@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409165503.GM10155@atomide.com>

On Tuesday 09 April 2013 10:25 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [130408 23:16]:
>>>
>> As I said, the IP has been there from OMAP2XX days. Here the case that
>> IP version is very similar between OMAP4, OMAP5. DRA(next SOC) and its
>> derivatives. Hence can share most of the code. I thought this was good
>> enough reason considering at least 4 family of SOC's can make use
>> of the code.
> 
> Well at least that might be enough of a reasoning to rename it as
> it is somewhat futureproof.
>
Yep. I can't see to much further in future but there is a *strong*
mandate to not break compatibility so hopefully we won't see too
much churn for similar IP blocks in future. 
  
>> It has nothing to do with SMP etc specifically and rather the similarity
>> between the PM infrastructure on the mentioned SOCs. 
>>
>> Let me know if you can suggested better name than what I chose ?
> 
> Not really except something like pm-iprevXXX.[chS] where the rev is
> the first revision that it works with?
> 
> But then again if it's touching registers all over the place directly,
> that naming does not make much sense either :)
> 
Exactly. Thanks for the discussion. I will go ahead with rename
when we add OMAP5 stuff like I did in earlier patch.
i.e
pm44xx.c --> pm_omap4plus.c
sleep44xx.S --> sleep_omap4plus.S

Regrads,
Santosh


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-10  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-05 12:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate code for re-use on OMAP5 Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate MPU subsystem PM code for re-use Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 13:19   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 13:35     ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 13:39       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 14:04       ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 14:18         ` Nishanth Menon
2013-04-05 14:29           ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 13:37     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate OMAP4 PM code to re-use it for OMAP5 Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 13:21   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-05 13:35     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 21:34   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-08 10:48     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-08 16:42       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-09  6:13         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-09 16:55           ` Tony Lindgren
2013-04-10  6:17             ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2013-04-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: OMAP4+: Make secondary_startup function name more consistent Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: OMAP4+: CPUidle: Consolidate idle driver for OMAP5 support Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-05 21:29   ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-05 23:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ARM: OMAP4+: PM: Consolidate code for re-use on OMAP5 Kevin Hilman
2013-04-08 11:03   ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516503EB.8080805@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).