linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Andreas Fenkart <andreas.fenkart@streamunlimited.com>
Cc: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, khilman@deeprootsystems.com,
	grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	balbi@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, daniel@zonque.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio/omap: implement irq mask/disable with proper semantic.
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:46:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517AA15B.2040104@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366620861-5489-2-git-send-email-andreas.fenkart@streamunlimited.com>


On 04/22/2013 03:54 AM, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
> When a gpio interrupt is masked, the gpio event will still be latched in
> the interrupt status register so when you unmask it later you may get an
> interrupt straight away. However, if the interrupt is disabled then gpio
> events occurring will not be latched/stored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Fenkart <andreas.fenkart@streamunlimited.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index 159f5c5..0b66c45 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -772,6 +772,12 @@ static void gpio_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  	_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * gpio_mask_irq - mask IRQ signalling
> + * @d : the gpio data we're acting upon
> + *
> + * Only signalling disabled. New IRQ still latched to IRQ status register.
> + */
>  static void gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> @@ -780,33 +786,76 @@ static void gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>  	_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 0);
> -	_set_gpio_triggering(bank, GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio), IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * gpio_unmask_irq - unmask IRQ signalling
> + * @d : the gpio data we're acting upon
> + *
> + * If an IRQ occured while IRQ was masked, you will get an IRQ straight away.
> + */
>  static void gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>  	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
>  	unsigned int irq_mask = GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio);
> -	u32 trigger = irqd_get_trigger_type(d);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -	if (trigger)
> -		_set_gpio_triggering(bank, GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio), trigger);
>  
> -	/* For level-triggered GPIOs, the clearing must be done after
> -	 * the HW source is cleared, thus after the handler has run */
> -	if (bank->level_mask & irq_mask) {
> -		_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 0);
> +	/*
> +	 * For level-triggered GPIOs, clear the IRQ. If the HW
> +	 * still needs service, IRQ will be latched again
> +	 */
> +	if (bank->level_mask & irq_mask)
>  		_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
> -	}
>  
>  	_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 1);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * gpio_disable_irq - disable the interrupt
> + * @d : the gpio data we're acting upon
> + *
> + * While disabled all IRQ events are ignored. No latching to IRQ status
> + * register.
> + */
> +static void gpio_disable_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> +	_set_gpio_triggering(bank, GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio), IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +	_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 0);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * gpio_enable_irq - enable the interrupt
> + * @d : the gpio data we're acting upon
> + *
> + * Enables latching and signalling IRQ.
> + */
> +static void gpio_enable_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	unsigned int gpio = irq_to_gpio(bank, d->irq);
> +	unsigned int irq_mask = GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio);
> +	u32 trigger = irqd_get_trigger_type(d);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> +	if (trigger)
> +		_set_gpio_triggering(bank, GPIO_INDEX(bank, gpio), trigger);
> +	_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, gpio);
> +	_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, gpio, 1);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip gpio_irq_chip = {
>  	.name		= "GPIO",
>  	.irq_shutdown	= gpio_irq_shutdown,
> @@ -815,6 +864,8 @@ static struct irq_chip gpio_irq_chip = {
>  	.irq_unmask	= gpio_unmask_irq,
>  	.irq_set_type	= gpio_irq_type,
>  	.irq_set_wake	= gpio_wake_enable,
> +	.irq_disable    = gpio_disable_irq,
> +	.irq_enable     = gpio_enable_irq,
>  };

I tested the above patch on some omap2/3/4 boards and this appears to
break ethernet support (which is using a gpio as an interrupt). I am
guessing this is related to the wake-up enable, so this needs some more
work.

Cheers
Jon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-12  9:13 [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: implement irq_enable/disable using mask/unmask Andreas Fenkart
2013-04-12  9:13 ` [PATCH] " Andreas Fenkart
2013-04-12 10:19   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-12 11:07     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-04-19 19:25       ` Andreas Fenkart
2013-04-19 19:20     ` [PATCH v2] gpio/omap: implement irq mask/disable with proper semantic Andreas Fenkart
2013-04-20 12:35       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-22  8:54         ` [PATCH v3] gpio/omap: implement irq mask/disable with proper Andreas Fenkart
2013-04-22  8:54           ` [PATCH v3] gpio/omap: implement irq mask/disable with proper semantic Andreas Fenkart
2013-04-23 23:38             ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-25 19:30             ` Jon Hunter
2013-04-25 19:40             ` Jon Hunter
2013-04-26 15:46             ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2013-04-26  7:56       ` [PATCH v2] " Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517AA15B.2040104@ti.com \
    --to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
    --cc=andreas.fenkart@streamunlimited.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=daniel@zonque.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).